You are here: IE »   Story

This is a mega telecom scam, cries CPM

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Discount UK Shopping

    The CPM on Friday accused Communication Minister A Raja of misleading the Parliament on the issuance of new telecom licences at throw away prices that allegedly cost the exchequer a whopping Rs 1,00,000 crores and demanded that the Prime Minister Manmohan Singh look into it.

    "This is a mega telecom scam. New telecom licences have been given on first-come, first-serve basis at the prices fixed in 2001. The market value of these licences is roughly seven times higher now," CPM Polit Bureau member Sitaram Yechury told reporters in New Delhi.

    The existing mobile operators under the umbrella of Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI) had also opposed the decision of issuing new licences at a fixed price of Rs 1,651 crore for pan-India coverage.

    Raja had defended the decision, saying that as late as in March 2007, just two months before he took charge from his predecessor Dayanidhi Maran, new licences were given to existing players at the same price.

    Ads by Google

    Yechury said the government should have adopted a policy of open auction to arrive at market-determined price for issuing new licences and spectrum.

    Asked whether CPM has joined hands with the COAI for opposing the new policy, the party's leader Nilotpal Basu denied this and said that they were also demanding an enquiry into allocation of additional spectrum to existing players beyond their eligibility.

    Raja, in reply to a question in Parliament, had claimed that neither the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) nor the telecom regulator TRAI had raised any objection to the allocation of spectrum to 2G telecom service providers on a first-come, first-serve basis.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    Raja ka majaaBy: K Suresh | 20-Dec-2008 Reply | Forward What a shame.DMK has been enjoying at the center at the cost of the country.CPM is rising this issue now.They would have kept silent if they were part of UPA.Indian public need to know the facts when it comes to deals of this kind. The press has a greater responsibilty to educate the public about real facts.DMK is always a corrupt party. They have agreat lineage in it.AIDMK is no exception either.Our nation will really grow only if we weed out corrution firmly.Our priorities on Education,Food,Clothing ,shelter and security needs a relook and commitment.That will only happen if we have clean persons in power.The parlimentary system is in such a mess that India needs presidential form of government.INDIA is great nation of people ruled by scoundrels.
    SCAMSBy: yohan | 20-Dec-2008 Reply | Forward decadence of democracy.No scam of ruling party will be enquired.other countries even president is subjected to probes.our ruling parties capture all autonomous bodies under their feet. donation of Amar Singh to Clinton Foundation will be justified by UPA like cash for vote, improper assets case, etc.When mayavati was supporting UPA no case was against her
    moneyBy: yohan | 20-Dec-2008 Reply | Forward decadence of democracy. No scam of ruling party will be enquired.other countries even president is subjected to probes.our ruling parties capture all autonomous bodies under their control.transaction of Amar Singh to Clinton Foundation will be justified by UPA like what they did for cash for vote, improper assets case, etc., of SP as they supporting UPA. When mayavati was supporting UPA no case was against her and case against MS Yadav was ongoing. once BSP withdrew support and SP supported UPA, the cases swapped. If this is democracy that anyone supporting ruling party will have no problem in any offences, it is high time we think of the perilous journey of our democratic principles. it is an irony that a great speaker who fought all his life time against corruption, purity in public life is a part of this vicious circle and is not trying to come out of their clutch. One ex-UN Addl Sec is now in UPA and he is going on insulting the nati
    where is transparencyBy: kirit shah | 20-Dec-2008 Reply | Forward india needs development. even if there is something wrong in allocating spectrum if it leads to development everyone should cooperate. generally such cases arise out of different perception of the same thing. upa is very slow in implementing the spectrum policy and probably nontransparent. confusion arises but then this is the way indian political class works. ruling class does not provide enough reasons for adopting any policy and then the policy gets into trouble. transparency should be the important criteria for any policy implementation.
    Mega telecom scamBy: paritosh | 20-Dec-2008 Reply | Forward Conduct of ministers in the UPA Govt belonging to DMK party of Tamil Nadu have been notoriously bereft of probity and pursued in absolute disregard to any transparency in handling the affairs of their respective Ministries be it telecom, be it national ways and so on.. Only two days' ago Delhi High Court expressed its virtual anguish in the highly questionable manner and objective the decisions/actions of the Ministry headed by another DMK man, T R Baalu, are being pursued that has resulted in virtual death of the National Highway projects. Ironically, CPM party, so long it remained bonded with DMK party, choose to overlook the rampant corruption perpetrated by these Ministers at the centre and have now chosen to wake up to Raja's scanduluous acts only after tying the knot with the rivals of DMK, Ms Jayalalitha's party in T.N. Double speaks has become synonemous with the CPM!!
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.