Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Tiananmen whites

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Beijing is not biting. For now the CCP is asking hard questions about the state of the US economy and exploring long term options for reducing China’s American vulnerabilities.

    Chinese sceptics

    As Geithner landed in Beijing, the city’s new English daily Global Times published a survey of Chinese financial experts that challenged Geithner’s assurances.

    Among the twenty-three economists polled by the Global Times, seventeen said US paper poses great risks to China’s economy. Many of these pessimists feared the United States may transfer its crisis to China by simply printing US dollars. The optimists, in a minority, insisted that when compared with the risks of investing elsewhere, the US paper was still the best bet for China.

    On finding a way out, most Chinese experts felt that Beijing ought to expand its investment on tangible and strategic assets such as gold, grain, and oil. They also believed that Chinese enterprises should focus on acquiring valuable companies around the world.

    Ads by Google

    The writer is a Professor at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore

    Previous123
    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.