Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

To clear backlog, SC calculates: 1,500 judges in HCs, 23,000 in lower courts

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Making the point that courts do not have a “magic wand” to do away with pendency of cases, the Supreme Court , after examining figures for both civil and criminal cases over seven years, has for the first time assessed that the judiciary needs “1,547 High Court judges and 23,207 subordinate court judges, only to clear the backlog in one year.”

    This requirement took into account vacancies that existed on January 1 this year, both in the High Courts and subordinate courts. Also factored in was average disposal of cases per judge.

    Against a sanctioned strength of 886 High Court judges, the working strength was 606 — 280 vacancies. With the average number of cases disposed by an HC judge working out to 2,504, the Supreme Court calculated that 1,547 HC judges would be needed to clear the backlog in one year.

    For a subordinate court judge, the average rate of disposal was 1,138 cases. On the basis of cases disposed last year and the working strength on December 31, 2008, it was calculated that 23,207 judges would be needed to clear the backlog in subordinate courts.

    Ads by Google

    With arrears increasing almost every year, this assessment by the Supreme Court will be one of the key issues that will be discussed at a conference of chief justices in New Delhi later this week. To be chaired by Chief Justice of India K G Balakrishnan and other apex court judges, it will discuss ways to streamline and improve the justice delivery system.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    What about procedural reforms also?By: S.M.Singru | 12-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward Yes we badly need more judges, but we also need to ensure that so many cases are not allowed to find their way to High Courts
    Just Do itBy: R.Ramachandran | 12-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward Sir,One of the mose serious drawback in India is the slow judicial process, mainly due to inadequate judicial infrastructure. Let the Central Government / State Govts. immediately agree to the SCs proposal and create the needed infracture along with Manpower of Judges. Let the cases be disposed of quickly. The reduction in pendency and quick disposal of fresh cases in a time-bound manner will go a long way in arresting corruption, malpractices, criminal activities, financial / political frauds etc.THIS REFORM SHOULD BE ACCEPTED AND IMPLEMENTED WITHOUT ANY FURTHER DELAY BY THE GOVT. OF THE DAY. MY APPEAL TO THE GOVT. IS JUST DO IT. THIS WILL SOLVE MANY PROBLEMS.
    more JUDGES REQUIRED TO CLEAR BACKLOGBy: Rajesh Vyas | 12-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward In addition to appointing more judges, the courts should also do away with vacations. Let there be a professional approach for the judiciary too. It was okay during the British times for overseas judges to have vacations during summers. In an age of air-conditioners, summer vacations are uncalled for. Maybe this would expedite resolution of cases. Are the honorable judges willing to make this SACRIFICE!!!
    Can we not reduce our prayers to one page?By: M.L.Gupta | 12-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward The pendency will not reduce even if the entire requirement is met in one go. The reason is that the prayers before the courts are unnecessarily lengthy. See just the Kasab case-is it not in thousands of pages?We should immediately change the format of the prayers. Even matters of simple nature tend to take long for redressal-fighting a case in the court is an unending debating competition!More than half the time of the court is spent in defining and interpreting a single word-one can see the number of pages devoted to the word 'liberty' in Basu's commentary and the citations given by him to see the terrible wastage of time. In Kasab's case when he has admitted his guilt, the case is still going on.Besides adding to pendency, such lengthy petitions devastate large forests from which the paper on which the case book is typed come.The quasi-judicial fora too imitate the same drill,whereas most cases are disposable orally. The govt. need to reform the system urgently.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.