Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Touch me not

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • This could have made news 60 years ago. And even then, it would have been shocking. For the fact of Dalits entering a temple to make headlines in the 21st century only goes to show that untouchability is far from a bygone evil.

    The injustice is so stark, the story makes easy telling. When a group of Dalits had previously tried to enter the Ekambareshwarar temple in Tamil Nadu’s Nagapattinam district, they found it locked by the temple management. After many rounds of negotiations with the village panchayat, a group of Dalits reattempted entry — this time under police escort — only to have stones hurled, and the situation spiralled out of control. This is a scandal, an insult to our Constitution and the enlightenment that it embodies. Not only is there a specific proscription against untouchability in the Indian Constitution, but temple entry for Dalits had also galvanised our early social reformers in much the same way school desegregation galvanised the American civil rights movement. It is, in these extremely imperfect and regrettable circumstances, a relief that on Tuesday a group of 80 Dalits, under full police escort and accompanied by district officials, finally entered the temple and prayed.

    Ads by Google

    But prayers are not enough, if the government wants to prevent a repeat incident. The law is not the problem. As it is, many of the caste Hindus in the village apparently piped down after they were told that their actions were illegal and merited consequences — an example of how the law can be made to work. The initiative then must lie with the government, especially the district administration. The message they send out must be loud and clear: preventing Dalits from entering temples is a crime, and those who prevent them from doing so will be made to pay.

    this article is selective amnesiaBy: indian | 30-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward The author had found discrimination and suppression of dalits over this temple entry issue.. but has been blind to the 25 years of kashmiri pundits, who not evenable to go back to their home..
    Face it...By: Roy | 30-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward The Hindu babus of the extreme right wing do not permit their less fortunate Hindu brethern the Dalits to worship along with them...some of these Hindus go to lengths to pin the blame on a Government appeasing the minority when they the Hindus themselves practice caste system...they do not help them in crisis
    Caste systemBy: YD | 30-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward I can not understand how IE can blame general public for castism when it is an important factor in Congress policy i.e to unite Muslims and Christians but surgically divide Hindus on caste and sub-castes and gotras within the sub-castes and further divide Hindus on regions etc to create vote banks. This is the policy of every political outfit, look at Laloo, Mulayam, Mayawati. The movement to unite Hindus and all other religions has been thwarted by Congress. All political parties select candidated only on caste consideration. It is Congress and its supporters who have distroyed India.
    Who benefitsBy: Ram | 30-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward You have explained the correct reason about who benefits when the Caste system is kept alive in India.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.