Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Tough ladies

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • It is disturbing that no newspaper other than yours seems to adequately cover important issues concerning the welfare of women. But your reports have exposed just how some MPs tried to kill the Womens’ Reservation Bill. You have also shown how the government denies equality to women in the armed forces.

    Women are not eligible for permanent commission in the Indian army and air force, they are compulsorily retired in the prime of their life, even though they have to prove to be equal to men in all respects. But the government has denied “any sort of discrimination” against women in court. The government counsel has stated that “women officers accepted the job knowing well the conditions of service from the outset” and added that “this is a policy matter”. Does that mean outdated policies should not be changed?

    — Kamala Sundaresan

    Ads by Google

    Pune

    Women commissioned officers have been serving in defence for the last 15 years. This was sufficient time for the military top brass to decide whether they were suitable for the tasks entrusted to them. If a woman officer has worked well, there is no reason why she should not be suitable for permanent commission. When there is a deficiency of commissioned officers, there is no justification for “retiring” trained and experienced women officers if they are willing to serve further.

    There is a need to give a larger number of vacancies to women so that they can fulfil their aspirations and serve the nation by joining a field where many men are scared to tread.

    — H.S. Gur

    Hisar

    Exit loser

    This refers to your editorial ‘Carry on Doctor’. The Supreme Court has called Anbumani Ramadoss’s bluff over his personal war with P. Venugopal. Ramadoss made all-out efforts to see that Parliament passed the ordinance ensuring the untimely exit of Venugopal. You are right in saying that despite India’s enormous public health needs, ministers choose to fight “imaginary monsters”. The health minister should now resign.

    — S.K. Gupta

    Delhi

    One, united tongue

    I agree with M.S. Ananth’s view that multilingualism will shatter the fabric of the Indian administration. Macaulay wanted English to be taught in India to produce natives with a working knowledge of the language. But once the language was established, it produced Raja Ram Mohun Roy, Tagore, J.C. Bose, Tilak, Gokhale, Gandhi and Nehru. The British were finally thrown out by this very language. The mode of governance and the cultural diversity of India is such that it cannot be run without English. After all, English gave us a language which made us a nation.

    — M.G. Kapahy

    Delhi

    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.