Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Tough to fault HC 377 ruling: Law Ministry

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Gay rights
    Centre has sought time from the Supreme Court to formulate its stand on the issue of homosexuality.
    Personal Loan

    The Union Law Secretary has told the government that it’s difficult to find any lacunae in the judgment of the Delhi High Court which struck down provisions in Section 377 of the IPC that criminalised homosexuality.

    This comes when the Centre has sought time from the Supreme Court to formulate its stand on the issue. On Tuesday, it told the court it did not want a stay on the July 2 verdict of the Delhi High Court that legalised gay sex among consenting adults.

    In his report to Union Law Minister M Veerappa Moily, Law Secretary T K Vishwanathan is also learnt to have said that there are no sufficient grounds on the basis of which an appeal could be maintainable in the Supreme Court. He has also suggested an innovative way out of the impasse.

    The Law Secretary had been asked to submit a report at a meeting of the Union Ministers of Law, Home and Health on July 3. Moily is expected to share the Secretary’s report with the Home and Health Ministers later this month.

    Ads by Google

    Vishwanathan is learnt to have recommended that a March 2000 report of the Law Commission on review of the IPC and CrPC on rape could be one answer to the government’s problem.

    In this report, the Commission had recommended repealing Section 377 and making rape “gender-neutral.”

    At present, only a man can be charged under the offence of rape of a woman. A male member of the society can’t levy rape allegations against anybody. This offence is dealt with the section dealing with sodomy.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    Sec 377By: raja | 22-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward If report is correct, then it is good that Law MInistry has realised. But, the religious leaders carry a lot of power. Will ministers likes Chidambaram and Moily and Azad agree? Waiting for your newspaper's next story.
    HC 377 RulingBy: Rajesh Vyas | 22-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Why can't we leave the Gay people alone. If we are a democracy, why can't we let the gays do what they wish to do? As ruled by the HC, sexual relations between two consenting adults is none of state's business. All the hoopla against the HC ruling just proves one thing--We are the biggest hypocrites on the face of the earth!!!!!!As long as the Gays are not causing any trouble to society at large, they should allowed to act as they want. Let the state stop moralising and the state should rather concentrate on providing the basic amenities to people. HOMOSEXUALITY IS AS OLD AS MANKIND--NO NEED TO LEGISLATE SEXUAL BEHAVIOUR!!!!!!
    What about Animals and Dead in respect to section 377.By: Akhtar Javed Usmani | 22-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Section 377 of IPC is a sweping section, which deal with the any kind of natural sex amongst men to man, animal and human, and woman and man. It is not about only same sex. The consenting age is different as animal could not consent and the NECROFILIC perferom on deads. The No doubt it is odd, but it is human too. Honourable Justice Michel Kirby, AC, CMG High Court of Australia while delivering key note address at Kuala Lumpur in April 2002 during the workshop on Judicial accountability organised by Commonwealth Lawyer Association observed that, “The criminalisation of homosexual acts, even when performed in private by consenting adults reflected, in part, understandings of religious texts. It is not a "choice" or a "lifestyle", selected by a few stubborn people to defy the society. It is part of the person's being: just as skin colour, gender or other imprints of nature". So law ministry must not look to gay and lesbian but on dead and animal too. It needs suitable amends.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.