Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Towards a re-united Indian subcontinent

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • The last day of August saw me travel to Solapur, a city in southern Maharashtra, to deliver a talk on ‘Mohammed Ali Jinnah and India’s Partition’. What was heartening was that I was invited by the cultural wing of the employees of the Janata Sahakari Bank, one among the 42 cooperative banks in the city. Moreover, the talk was part of the 10-day Vyakhyaanmaala (public lecture series) to mark the Ganesh Festival, a popular tradition in many cities and towns across Maharashtra.

    If animated street-level celebration is one face of the festival, the other is the fine tradition of public lectures meant to educate the people on an amazingly wide range of topics—from climate change to swine flu, from cross-border terrorism to challenges in Indian agriculture. The organisers of these events deserve to be commended because they have kept alive the vision that prompted Lokamanya Tilak, more than a century ago, to use the Ganesh Festival as a platform for patriotic mobilisation of the people during India’s freedom movement. He changed the character of this festival from a mere religious celebration to a cultural congregation, cutting across caste and community barriers, to reawaken the nationalist sentiments among the masses.

    Ads by Google

    Sadly, some irreligious and anti-religious Marxist historians have pronounced leaders like Tilak and Gandhiji guilty of giving a Hindu communal orientation to the freedom movement by using symbols like Ganesh and Ram. This is a baseless charge. There are any number of instances to show that Tilak was not anti-Muslim. He participated in Mohurram processions in Pune. He once invited Jinnah to attend a Ganesh festival programme in Mumbai. Jinnah came and there is a photograph showing him standing next to Tilak at the festival celebrations, which I have used in one of my previous columns in this newspaper (July 23, 2006). That was the happy time when Jinnah was, in the words of Gopal Krishna Gokhale and later of Sarojini Naidu, an “Ambassador of Hindu-Muslim Unity”. The unhappy times, when Jinnah became a rank communalist and a venomous votary of India’s Partition, came later.

    ... contd.

    Next1234
    doctorBy: a.p.mattu | 12-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward pakistan,bangladesh and india,they must forget the past ,and reconciliate , to become one country,only this way they can compete against great country
    Divorces are permanent.By: Dhawan | 09-Sep-2009 Reply | Forward Mr. KulkarniYou are talking about something people will never digest. Those who have been through the catastrophe of 1947 would never like to unite to be once again subjected to some similar situation. History of India is full of many such thoughts but the net result has been the same devastation, killings looting and what not. So stop talking about reunion. Once divorced divorced for ever.
    The four cardinal PrinciplesBy: V.S.Malhotra | 07-Sep-2009 Reply | Forward So Mr. Kulkarni's proposal for reunification of the subcontinent seems to have been voted down by the respondents. But his reference to the four cardinal principles-Respect for all faiths, constitutionally guaranteed equality to all citizens, democracy, and independent foreign policy-still need to be commented about. Are we truly following these principles? or are we paying only lip service to them?
    Reunification of IndiaBy: Dr. D. Prithipaul | 06-Sep-2009 Reply | Forward Rhe Solapur lecture by S. Kulkarniis a good example of a well-intentioned ostrich with its head buried deep in the sands of sentimentality. Even in 1906 the Tilak-Jinnah pact was based on the recognition of the ,utual exclusivism of the two communities. The exclusivism of the Muslims in 1906 had a history of nearly 9 centuries behind it. It is difficult to understand why Hindus persist in not recognizing this fact. Jinnah ultimately proved to be the Mir Jafar for the 20th century Robert Clive, Winston Churchhill. Jinnah must be recognised for finally acting as a genuine Muslim.Continuing Kashmiri exclusisivism testiifies to an approval of Jinnah's exclusivism and of the fiction of the Kaum. It is a sobering thought that without partition the whole of the sub-continent would be today embroiled with Talibanism.
    Sub-Continent Union?By: Ramesh Kapoor | 06-Sep-2009 Reply | Forward EU today consists of countries which fought wars with each other. The reason why they came up together and yet maintaining their separate identity is well known. That is what the British Commonwealth intended, after the colonies became independent, only to lose their 'united' credentials. Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Burma and India were all ruled by Britain, and have gone separate ways. Religion is the major cause, and, of course, the ethnic orientation. There is no commonality whatsoever between these countries, except for a few of them. If boundaries have to be redrawn, except for the North-West frontier, rest of the Pakistan has commonality with Punjab, Sindh, Rajasthan, Gujarat, and Bangladesh with Bengal, Sri Lanka with Tamil Nadu, Burma with Assam. But is it possible, I don't think so, because of deep rooted hatred that has been built in over the years, and this cancer of hatred spreads instead of being curtailed.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.