Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Training its guns on the army

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • But the deliberate political interference in the Nepal army now brings back the old fear back among political parties that Maoists are still fixated on power and aim to crush all resistance. According to the military act in Nepal, brigadier generals who have served for four years may get a three year extension. The general practice so far has been the army headquarter’s recommendation on the issue. The prime minister has now taken the stand that denial of extension of services to the eight generals will open enormous opportunities for officers and jawans at lower level, a populist statement that has had positive impact at the lower level. The Maoist propaganda machinery however, been interpreting the issue in a much more radical way, warning political parties, especially the ones supporting the army, that ‘you all would have been in jailed by the King’s army if the Maoists and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) had not come to your rescue’. The Maoists are not only justifying the government ‘disowning’ the Nepal army, but also the continued existence of its private army — the PLA — something that has been the subject of concern in international quarters.

    The Communist Party of Nepal-Maoists (CPN-M) that leads the government after emerging as the single largest party in a democratic election still harps on the fear of takeover by the king’s forces and the ‘Nepal army loyal to it’. The defence minister has shared his ultimate plan to have the Nepal army replaced by the PLA as the national army with many, including India’s Deputy Chief of the Army Staff S.P.H. Dhillon who visited Nepal some three months ago.

    ... contd.

    PreviousNext123
    i disagree with GhimireBy: Prakash | 28-Mar-2009 Reply | Forward Ghimire who is known as one of the agents of RAW from is anti democratic and anti republic journalist or say a critic. For he often makes stringent criticisms on the Unified CPN(Maoist) terming them heading towards totlalitarianism or something like that. Why does he makes bitter remarks on Maoists and othr people? Does he advocating for the reinstatement of the kingship? If so he would have clearified himself. otherwise we dont classify him as a journalist. Rather he is a royalist who ofter hates the ruling party of present nepal and Ghimire always welcome anarchy and hooliganism just by cursing the Maoists.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.