Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Triumph of the moderate

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • In the past five years, the Left obstructed economic decision-making. The leaders of the government not only appeased the Left but were paralysed into inaction. After withdrawing its support from the UPA, the Left was replaced by the Samajwadi Party. The Samajwadi Party’s agenda was more than merely political. Its quid pro quo for support involved the receipt of generosity from the CBI for the party’s leader.

    The Left now attempted a new experiment. It led a combination of parties ranging from the BSP, TDP and AIADMK whose aim was to win over 100 seats and on that basis pressure the Congress into supporting a Third Front from within or outside. With the country being pushed into this nightmare, the UPA and the NDA attempted to increase their seats. But the voter wanted to favour one side decisively to ward off the Third Front threat.

    The architects of obstruction were badly punished and routed. The BSP got less than half the seats it expected. The Left was routed in the states of West Bengal and Kerala to its lowest tally in recent memory. The TDP and AIADMK were expected to fare much better but got only a small fraction of what they expected. The major gains of the UPA came from the states where the Third Front was hoping to do well. But the ripples of the anti-Third Front mood were also felt in the NDA-dominated states. We lost some seats in a number of states. The first message of the electorate was thus clear: they wanted a stable government free from any form of political obstruction.

    Ads by Google

    ... contd.

    PreviousNext1234
    Arun Jaitley should be elected party presidentBy: Anil | 18-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward India needs leaders like him who can think and can also talk in more than one languages preferably.
    BJP should de-centralizeBy: kiransan | 05-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward Politics and governance are getting increasingly decentralized. State Chief Ministers and performance of their govts. are significantly deciding the success of parties in state as well as lok sabha elections. BJP can adopt decentralization policy, and empower CMs or state level senior leaders to chalk out their own strategy, which will help them within the state. This will help them formulate strategies which are closer to what people want, and the sum-total of the state wins will help them overall at the Centre. The examples are MP, Gujarat and KArnataka where this has worked. Similarly for Congress this has worked in AP, KArnataka and Delhi.This will also help BJP to move away from RSS and communal politics. Chauhan, Modi, RAman Singh are popular because of their performance in the states, not due to RSS communal agenda. But reality is BJP does not WANT to change and wants to live in denial and self-pity. Even Sri Ram cant help such a party :-)
    Moderation is the soul witBy: Rahul Ajith | 04-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward Here are my reasons on why the BJP lost1) Advani is no Vajpayee. BJP needs to find a moderate face for their next leader2) Lesser youth participation3) People(esp youth) were completely disenchanted by incidence like Varun Gandhi.4) Lack of Allies. As Mr. Jaitley rightly mentioned, people wanted a stable government. The BJP, without allies and being considered untouchable by many would find it very difficult to form a stable government.5) Division of the marathi votes.6)Repeated attacks on the PM. Many people, including BJP fans may not like Dr.Manmohan Singh in the PM's Chair. But, once he is elected,he is respected. The post of PM is considered a one of dignity and honor. Attacking such a post is viewed by many voters as a national insult.It is important for the BJP to have nothing more than a sister relation with RSS. The RSS cannot dictate terms to BJP simply because they have no accountability.Hope the BJP emerges strong in the next election !
    Triumph of the moderateBy: N.V.SANKARAN | 29-May-2009 Reply | Forward The national average of voting in this election was just over 50%. While the minority, driven by the hate BJP propaganda unleashed by the secular parties and media, voted in very large numbers, majority of those who did not vote were the Hindus. The supporters of BJP were disillusioned and confused by the party's indecisiveness as whether it should follow a Hindutwa ideology or should follow the pseudo-secular ideology of the congress and other parties. In Kerala, the Congress got so many seats not because of a positive support, but it was the negative voting against the LDF government which helped them. Even the supporters new that the BJP did not stand a chance in Kerala and preferred to vote for the lesser evil of UDF.
    moderates have to leave bjpBy: charan gill | 28-May-2009 Reply | Forward I think BJP has no chance as they are averse to any change for the better.Demoralized and caught in multi personality syndrome BJP can not compete the congress gaining momentum whose leadership has harnessed the energy generated by our liberation struggle.m Moreover,they have achieved the cohesiveness at the top which is most valuable element for the future of a party.On the other hand RSS has decided to keep BJP bound to the same Hindu Raj agenda.Rather they are suggesting freedom from any moderation they have adopted as coalition compulsions.They have decided to follow right extreme.Moderates have to leave BJP.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.