The author of the first description about SIMI, Shahid Badar, the organisation's president during the first ban in September 2001, stated on oath before the Tribunal that “SIMI has ceased to exist after the first ban”. “SIMI does not endure any illegal or violent activities and has issued strong press statements condemning illegal and violent activities,” the organisation says in its affidavit.

But the Home Ministry's take on the SIMI has achieved the fourth ban for the latter in the Supreme Court, followed with an extension till October. The ministry, in its affidavit, describes SIMI as an association which is not only “financially sound” but capable of orchestrating frequent trans-border movements of its cadres to partner with international terror outfits like Lashkar-e-Toiba, the architect of the 2005 pre-Diwali blasts in Delhi, Hizb-ul-Mujahideen and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam.

The bans have not been “effective”, admits the ministry, “It (SIMI) has supporters in the Gulf countries. It has contacts in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, Bangladesh and Nepal. Pakistan-based Hizb-ul-Mujahideen and Lashkar-e-Toiba have successfully penetrated into SIMI cadres.”

The ministry quotes information by intelligence agencies of “pan-Islamic linkages of ex-SIMI activists with the LTTE cadres in carrying out militant activities in the country” during the years of ban.

“Its members being students and youths, SIMI is easily influenced by hardcore Muslim terror organisations operating within the country and abroad,” describes the ministry. To counter this Badar's version is that SIMI no longer exists. “It is for this reason that there is no office-bearer or member who could represent the organisation (in the litigation) and I have appeared in the present proceedings on the basis of having been the past president,” he says.