Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Two Generals under scanner in probe into Darjeeling real estate fraud

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Personal Loan

    An inquiry into a controversial land deal in Darjeeling has brought two of the seniormost Generals under the scanner and has put on hold the appointment of one of them as the Deputy Chief of Army Staff (DCAS).

    The inquiry was ordered after it came to light that an institution, allegedly posing as an affiliate of the Mayo College in Ajmer, obtained no-objection certificates (NOCs) from the Army for the transfer of a large portion of land near the 33 Corps HQ in Sukna, Darjeeling.

    The inquiry has put on hold the appointment of Lt Gen P K Rath, who was commanding 33 Corps when the matter came to light, as the DCAS (Information System and Training). The inquiry will also look into the role of all officers involved in granting the NOCs, including current Military Secretary Lt Gen Avadhesh Prakash who was then commanding the Darjeeling-based 17 Mountain Division.

    Ads by Google

    While the next step would be a formal Court of Inquiry (COI), Rath has been attached to the Kolkata-based Eastern Command till the internal inquiry is completed. He was to take charge next month as Deputy Chief at Army HQ. The post will now remain vacant till a decision is taken based on the initial inquiry.

    Sources said the inquiry pertains to the sale and transfer of a tea estate in Sukna near the 33 Corps HQ. The estate, which lies close to the HQ, had been put up for sale a few years ago. As it lay adjacent to Defence land, an Army NOC was required for its transfer. The sale was halted after the Army refused to give an NOC, keeping in mind the security of the cantonment.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    General under scannerBy: ashraf | 30-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward Media should exercise restraint on such issues, rather than sit on judgement and carry out a media trial. At the face of it there appears to be no big case as the land in question does not appear to be defence land and civil land could be used by its owner for bonafide puposes as the he deems fit. In the first place one does not understand under what rules(even if one archaic rule exists), army can deny usage of privte land and hold back issuing NOC. What NOC in the first place is required? Why should there be any requiremet of NOC? Are we still living in British Raj or in an ndependent India?
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.