Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Two Patil heads rolled after 26/11, one defends the other

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • R R
    Former Union Home Minister Shivraj Patil said R R Patil did good work in Maharashtra and people should judge 'in totality'.

    A day after RR Patil returned as Maharashtra Home Minister, former Union Home Minister Shivraj Patil praised him as a “young” and “enthusiastic” man who did all “he could have done” during his time in office.

    Faced with a firestorm of outrage following the Mumbai terror attacks, Shivraj Patil resigned on November 30, 2008. RR Patil, 52, followed on December 1, after having said only a day earlier that there was no possibility of his resigning. RR Patil had drawn flak for having said of the attacks, ‘In a big city like Mumbai, the odd tragedy keeps happening’.

    “He (RR Patil) had resigned because in the given political situation, because of public opinion, the government thought it would be better if he was not there. So, you cannot hold the minister or the government responsible for an incident. You should consider in totality the performance of a minister or a government to come to any conclusion,” Shivraj Patil told The Indian Express on Monday.

    Ads by Google

    “In my opinion, RR Patil is a young, educated, and enthusiastic man with a clean image. As home minister, he had done what a home minister could have done in Maharashtra. One incident apart, his performance was good. I am sure he would strengthen the security apparatus to provide better security to the state,” said Shivraj Patil.

    Asked if the results of the Maharashtra Assembly elections had called into question the general impression about the impact of terrorism on electoral outcomes, Shivraj Patil said people make assessments “in totality and come to correct conclusions”.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    Just Do Not Blame People in HurryBy: Pravin | 11-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward RR Patil is a good and clean person.So many times attempt were made to remove him from the position of Home Minister because he was clean and doing good things which some people do not wanted to be . After 26/11 these people got a arm in their hand and forced him to resign.Only a single slip of toung cost him the job. You need to check the situation at the time of the infamous press release. Get opinions from the Police department about his man. Do't judge him by some articles in newspapers.People always want to blame other people. Thats the human nature. Try to think before giving opinion about some respected persons.
    Terror does not matter if total view of vote banks is takenBy: vote bank and terrorism | 10-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward Pottyl is right. Terrorism does not matter. About 30% of the population is vote bank related by bonds of religion (islam and christianity) to anti Indian terrorists. Of the remaining, a large chunk under the principled stand of leftists, has always considered it their holy duty to break India into many nations so that the subcontinent is amenable to Chinese influence. Among the remaining, we have the likes of Shivraj Pottyl RR Pottyl rest of Congress, MNS, SP, Amitabh Bacchan, his brother Abu Azmi and Amar/Muallayam Sing, etc. Terrorism does not matter for votes if such a total view of the situation is considered, in fact secular parties can use it to show that they have given full freedom of practicing their religion to muslims, christians,and communists.
    Dont be shocked?????By: AGNI PUTHIRAN | 10-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward Dont be shocked that in two years time Dawood Ibrahim the notorious terrorist joins the congress party and becomes the chief minister of Maharastra?????it will happen.
    People like Mr Patil must be retainedBy: Sagar Ogale | 10-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward In our great country of India, very few politicians have dared to make unpopular (in political circles) yet correct decisions. It was RR Patil who banned the open prostitution carried out as "Bar dancing", he was the only home minister to talk about "Police reforms", he ensured there was "ZERO rioting in Maharashtra" under him. The list can continue...... I am not saying that he is "Mr. Clean" but he is "the best of what we have". Remember his rural beginnings and the fact that the comment that he made was only about the intelligence failure in the incident not the entire incident. I belive he is much better than the Rajs, Azmis, Modis, Varuns ... of our country. So why not give him another chance.
    He is there because we elected him.By: Anil Kohli | 10-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward Mr RR Patil re-appointed as the Home Minister in Maha,he had done a wonderful job during terror strike on Nov 26th 2008.After all did he not make light of this attack,as a minor incident in a major metropolis of India,we should learn to live with it.190 lives lost,no consequence we are a nation of billion plus,few lives lost should not galvanize or impel us to rile the political class or demand upgrading of security systems and equipment.The man was removed from this very post on 1st Dec 2008,what has changed now that the person in question is back at the helm of the same ministry.Did the political bosses make a wrong decision on 1st Dec 2008 or is it now?Guess both premise are wrong,the fact of the matter is new mandate has washed away all previous sins.We the electorate,have pardoned all the acts of omission/commission reelecting the same person.Who should bear the burden of this act? Naturally, we the people of Maha.We had the opportunity and the choice we were decisive in our act.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.