Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Two PMs, One Big Idea

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • It is fascinating that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh invoked the Vajpayee spirit to seek both inspiration and validation for his own move at Sharm el-Sheikh. Fascinating because Vajpayee made three landmark moves to make peace with Pakistan, each time going out on a limb, in spite of grave provocations. Each time he was let down — though by the Pakistanis, and not his own partymen, as almost became the case with Manmohan Singh until Sonia Gandhi imposed Section 144. And yet, each time the public opinion supported him. You ask Jairam Ramesh what were the strongest factors still working for the incumbent in the 2004 campaign, and he will tell you: highway building, and peace with Pakistan.

    Vajpayee’s first move came with the bus ride to Lahore. It was a decade ago, but not enough time has still passed for me to be able to recount the inside story of that move — which surprised the foreign ministries on both sides — or to disclose any conversations. But during that period there was no let-up in attacks in the Valley; in fact a major massacre took place even when Vajpayee was in Lahore. Yet he visited Minar-e-Pakistan and declared that a stable and prosperous Pakistan was entirely in India’s interest. The significance of a BJP prime minister making that statement was not lost on anybody in Pakistan. It was as historic as Advani’s subsequent rationalisation of Jinnah as a modern leader — and Vajpayee was never to go back on it even after the embarrassing, and politically near-fatal discovery that Musharraf’s infiltrators were occupying Kargil exactly when he was making the peace in Lahore. That is because finding peace with Pakistan was never a tactical, short-term ploy in his mind. It was a Great, Big idea. In fact, the Great Big Idea of his entirely statesmanly mind. And when he lost power in May 2004, his biggest regret was that he would not be able to take it to its logical conclusion.

    ... contd.

    Next1234
    Atal irraday..and..Manmohanay sapnnayBy: Prakash Kanungo | 07-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward It is TIME Indian PMs of both kind: Raja Kind or Telli Kind,learn basics about Pakistan that "Aam Admi" of India already know.Paki- Cardinal truths must be faced:( without looking at Vote Bank or being Immotional/ on moral high ground)1)Pakistan is in self destruction mode and India must allow it to happen.2) Why India should bail out USA/ UK for their historical blunders of 1945 till date..They have created and cultivated nuclear armed babby Pakistan...Let them sort out this spoilt brat.3)Democracy in Pakistan or any Islamic society can be finished off by "One Jeep and two Armed personnel carriers" as democracy is unpalletable to Islamic thought and Book.4)Once War trophy "Osama Bin Laden" is destroyed...USA is taking Rocket speed Exit from Af- Pak.Nuclear threats from Pakistan are to scare Western nations!5)Yes final solution will be written by Indian foot soldiers' blood,and surviving Pak.generals will have to face "Nuremberg " trials for Crimes against Humanity.
    MrBy: Ashok Kapur | 04-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward When do we learn that foreign policy should not be dictated by well meaning dreamers?Nehru went to the UN when we were about to knock off the problem.He volunteered to hold a plebicite when no one asked him to do so.60 years later and God knows how many years more we will be stuck with Kashmir as a problem.Nehru proclaimed a Hindi chini Bhai Bhai policy with good intentions and expecting reciprocity. His dream turned out to be our unending nightmare.Foreign policy decisions should not made on the spur of themoment but in evaluation of a million pros and cons. It is hard work.Intuition must not determine policy. Intuition is for gamblers. We are bad gamblers. Only it affects the future of our nation.Pakistanis are already crowing over the statement and gloating over our frustration at their response to our 26/11So what was the big deal that this article seems to glorify?
    Keep it up Mr.Gupta-By: C.Sanjay | 04-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward Only able can. This brilliant analysis of Dr.Singh's move and his invocation of ABV to justify his latest move and in turn Shekhar's de-classification of his encounters prove that.Wish able minded people with influence over public opinion could 'read' this and help propagate beyond confines of thinking IE reading few to grass root mass.Keep it up Mr.Gupta.
    Vajpayee By: Sanjiv | 03-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward Even though ABV made 3 attempts for peace with Pakistan his sense of timing the attempt and rolling them back was superb. He did not hesitate to declare "Aar ya Paar Ka Yudha" when it was necessary. His each initiative was based on credibility of govermnment of Pakistan. He dealt with Mush twice when Mush was in full command.Secondly, he was tall enough and capable enough to ignore RSS elements who tried to control him remotely. RSS needed Vajpayee he never required them to prove his mettle.With MMS it is different. He is clealy giving impression of uckling under US pressure. Nobody in India knows who is in command in Pakistan - Gilani, Zardari or the enigmatic Gen Kayani. Lstly, MMS's remote control has started treating him as a stop gap nuisance and MMS badly needs its support as in the absence of Remote he is non-entity.
    Who are we trying to fool?By: Manoj Agarwal | 03-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward I totally disagree with the analysis put forward here. There is only one thing that is common between what Vajpayee did and what Dr.Singh is trying to do and that is desire to have peace with Pakistan. But similarity ends right there. Vajpayee never desired peace at the cost of our national interest, self esteem and strategic goals. He never compromised on our basic tenet as a victim of terrorism perpetuated from Islamabad against us. Yes, we need to talk but under certain parameters that we think are fundamental to out position vis-à-vis terrorism. By giving victim certificate to sponsor of terrorism, by institutionalizing joint anti terror mechanism, by de-linking dialogue with acts of terrorism and by putting final nail in the form of Balochistan, I really don't know what are we trying to achieve? If anything that we witnessed in last five years, it is unprecedented increase in terrorist attack in India. What Guzral did on the ground by rolling back RAW, MMS is doing on the table.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.