Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Two states, one district, and a 50-year-old dispute

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Personal Loan

    The border dispute between Karnataka and Maharashtra has flared up again, with Karnataka Chief Minister B S Yeddyurappa on Monday seeking Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s intervention to “guide” the neighbouring state to give up its claim on Belgaum and other Marathi-speaking areas on the border. The Shiv Sena has also got into the picture, attacking buses from Karnataka, and warning the BJP to “control its (Karnataka) Chief Minister”. It has said a party delegation would soon meet the President and Prime Minister to discuss the issue. An outline of the origins of the dispute and how it has played out over five decades:

    History of the dispute

    Located near the borders of Maharashtra and Goa, Belgaum became a part of the Bombay Presidency after Independence. In 1948, the Belgaum municipality requested that the district, having a predominant Marathi-speaking population, be incorporated into the proposed Maharashtra State. However, the States Reorganisation Act of 1956, which divided states on linguistic and administrative lines, made Belgaum a part of the then Mysore State. The issue has ever since been a bone of contention between the two states.

    Ads by Google

    The Maharashtra government contested the inclusion and lodged a protest with the Centre in September 1957, leading to the formation of the Mahajan Commission under former Chief Justice Mehr Chand Mahajan in October 1966. The Commission, which submitted its report in August 1967, recommended that 262 villages be transferred to Maharashtra and rejected Karnataka’s claim over Belgaum, Karwar town and 300 villages in Karwar, Supa and Haliyal taluks.

    ... contd.

    Next123
    What kind of people are we ?By: shiman | 20-Jan-2009 Reply | Forward I feel very sad when this type of news arise when two state of one country claims for one region as their land .I was thinking after the incident happened in mumbai on 26th november will make change the thinking and unite all the citigen and think about the country not about a region or state but the situation not yet changed. The politicians are only knows how to be in publicity everyday by making a serious stupid opnions and disturbs the mind of the public in a unnecessary issue .The politician shold think how to improve the economic,social ,defence and other espects so we can handelled the situation when it needed .I think devide a state is not solution it differentiates us by state like biharis UP walas Marathi or etc and causes conflict .So my opinion is that not to divide us in state or community or religion but think how to fight against pakistan at this time .Remember china is also a country which supports Pakistan which is farmore powerful country interms of economy .
    Utter foolishnessBy: Neeraj | 20-Jan-2009 Reply | Forward I don't think there are any Raj Thakrey's in Karnataka who would drive marathis out of Karnataka.These political parties are fighting on illogical issues instead they should divert there energies towards their state's development.Banglore and Mumbai generates so much of revenue yet the state of these two capitals is dismal in terms for basic infrastructure.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.