Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Two states, one district, and a 50-year-old dispute

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Terming the Mahajan report as biased and illogical, Maharashtra rejected it and demanded another review of the situation. Though Karnataka has ever since continued to press for implementation of the Commission’s report, it was never formally implemented by the Centre.

    Why it has resurfaced

    In December 2005, the Congress-led government at the Centre decided to revive discussions on the border row, even as the states stuck to their guns. On March 15, 2006, the Maharashtra Government filed a petition in the Supreme Court stating that there was a “feeling of insecurity among Marathi-speaking people living in Karnataka in recent days”. The Centre filed an affidavit in August the same year stating that Maharashtra’s claim was not maintainable in law, but withdrew it soon. Karnataka grew sceptical.

    The Maharashtra Ekikaran Samiti

    Ads by Google

    The MES was formed in 1948 and has been spearheading the agitation for about six decades to incorporate Belgaum and 865 adjoining villages in Maharashtra. According to the MES, 43 per cent of the district population is Marathi. Wielding a significant presence in the region, the MES emerged as the majority party in the Belgaum City Council (BCC) in the 1980s and remained so until the dissolution of the council by the Karnataka Government in 2005. The MES cried foul, calling it discrimination against Marathi people, but the Government did not change its stand. The MES has been observing November 1, the Rajyotsava Day (Foundation Day) of Karnataka, as ‘Black Day’ and January 17 as “Martyrs’ Day” every year to commemorate the killing of five people from Belgaum in police firing while they were protesting against the decision to include the city in Karnataka.

    ... contd.

    PreviousNext123
    What kind of people are we ?By: shiman | 20-Jan-2009 Reply | Forward I feel very sad when this type of news arise when two state of one country claims for one region as their land .I was thinking after the incident happened in mumbai on 26th november will make change the thinking and unite all the citigen and think about the country not about a region or state but the situation not yet changed. The politicians are only knows how to be in publicity everyday by making a serious stupid opnions and disturbs the mind of the public in a unnecessary issue .The politician shold think how to improve the economic,social ,defence and other espects so we can handelled the situation when it needed .I think devide a state is not solution it differentiates us by state like biharis UP walas Marathi or etc and causes conflict .So my opinion is that not to divide us in state or community or religion but think how to fight against pakistan at this time .Remember china is also a country which supports Pakistan which is farmore powerful country interms of economy .
    Utter foolishnessBy: Neeraj | 20-Jan-2009 Reply | Forward I don't think there are any Raj Thakrey's in Karnataka who would drive marathis out of Karnataka.These political parties are fighting on illogical issues instead they should divert there energies towards their state's development.Banglore and Mumbai generates so much of revenue yet the state of these two capitals is dismal in terms for basic infrastructure.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.