Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Two Towers of Babel

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • In 1960, the late Israeli satirist Ephraim Kishon viewed Israel as a land rebuilding the Tower of Babel. India is that Tower of Babel. The post-1992 diplomatic bonhomie has set to rest decades of mutual discomfort, shyness and curiosity; decades when one compared Nehruvian socialism and Israeli Labor socialism or Indian and Zionist nation-building, but from a distance. Then it was the Hindu Right and Jewish Right.

    Today, terror attacks have ensured a common bloody fate that makes greater demands, especially on the Indian Right, for collaboration in defence and security. The Indian Left, for its part, must express its reservations on growing Indo-Israeli ties, its voice getting shriller when Israel undertakes operations like Cast Lead.

    Israel is just 12 days away from the February 10 Knesset elections. But apart from these ideological salvoes, the Indian non-academic public discourse on the subject lacks understanding of the institutions, polity and daily business of Israel — how we converge on fundamentals and differ in details, as India too heads for general elections.

    Ads by Google

    Israel suffers from too much democracy, not too little. It is a pluralistic polity with a multi-party system, a heterogeneous society where one in every five Israelis is an Arab. Let alone the myriad Jewish denominations. Meandering and chaotic, Israel is also West Asia’s only democracy worth the name.

    At the time of Israel’s declaration of independence, controversy arose over the reference to God in the Declaration of the Establishment of the State of Israel. The secular Left wanted nothing to do with a text referring to the immaterial. Religious, and non-religious but identity-conscious, Jews couldn’t conceive of a Declaration without “God” that would determine Jewish destiny. The solution was the term “Tzur Israel (Rock of Israel)”. This tradition-loaded phrase denoted God, but was ambiguous enough for secular connotations to proliferate. Confusion, controversy, disagreement and compromise remain symptomatic of Israel’s functioning. Israel’s building block was the not easily defined “Jewishness”, which includes but is not synonymous with Judaism. The secular Zionist Left built Israel, where subsequently the religious Right and Zionist Right emerged as powerful players. Religion lay behind India’s bloody Partition: an identity ever present, ever denied in the declamatory secularism of a country where too the Right rose to political prominence after the heyday of centrism.

    ... contd.

    Next123
    wrong analysisBy: mathew | 30-Jan-2009 Reply | Forward Sudeep Paul as usual gets his analysis wrong. Perhaps he needs to go beyond reading left leaning Israeli newspapers. Barak stands to gain the most because of the successful "Operation Cast Lead". Labour which was not thought to be in the reckoning even in the first week of December has seen its popularity sky rocket. KAdima will also benefit from the success of the Gaza operations. While Israeli public opinion is still skeptical about a hawkish NEtanyahu, Likud is not expected to get more than 20 seats. In such an eventuality he has agreed to form a national unity government with KAdima. Israel Beitenhu party headed by the extreme right wing Lieberman may win upto 15 seats.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.