Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Two victims of war against Naxals, two different stories

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • In May 2007, Illina Sen, 57, was holidaying with her mother in Bengal when she got a call from her husband, Chhattisgarh-based doctor Binayak Sen. “There is a constable at the door,” he told her, “they want me to go to the police thana.”

    “He went,” Illina says, before pausing, then adding: “he hasn’t yet returned.” After two long years in jail, Sen is finally set to return home, with the Supreme Court granting him bail on Monday.

    Sen was arrested by the Chhattisgarh police for passing on information from a jailed Naxalite to his supporters. He denies these charges, attributing his arrest to his criticism of state atrocities in its war against the Naxals.

    Her world plunged into chaos, Illina has been running from pillar to post, meeting lawyers as well as well-wishers who have floated the ‘Free Binayak Sen’ campaign. This in addition to working as a sociology professor in Wardha, Maharashtra. Her efforts seem to have paid off finally.

    Ads by Google

    Archana Gupta-Soni, 36, was at home in the steel town of Bhilai on April 16 when the phone rang. “There’s been an accident,” the voice said, “your husband is hurt”. It was not until later that day, when she saw crowds gathering outside her house, that Archana understood what was being replayed endlessly on television — her husband, U C Gupta, was dead. He had been on election duty in the Naxal-infested Rajnandgaon district in Chhattisgarh, when he was killed in a landmine blast along with four others.

    ... contd.

    Next1234
    Presumed Guilty - part 3By: Sivasubramanian Muthusamy | 26-May-2009 Reply | Forward Indian Police Service needs to wait for at least a decade of evolution and prioritized oversight before being considered eligible for exceptions from rules (which are not there). It first requires a FBI style book that says that the policeman has to approach any suspect with respect and dutifully recite “you have a right to remain silent”. In India this needs to change to “You have a right to refuse arrest”.
    Presumed Guilty ... part 2By: Sivasubramanian Muthusamyh | 26-May-2009 Reply | Forward Indian Police Force originated in the pre-independence era as a force aligned and subservient to the British Government of the times whose priority was anything but Civil Rights – the task of the Police was just the opposite of Civil Rights – that of dealing with the Civil Rights movement by any means as desired by the State. With such origins, the Police Service in India perpetuated their loyalty to their bosses who are now State level politicians and local politicians. What was not there in pre-independence days was corruption and a nexus with crime, which is now added to all that makes Indian Police Service not-so-respectable.
    Presumed Guilty, unless otherwise proven Innocent?By: Sivasubramanian Muthusamy | 26-May-2009 Reply | Forward The jurisprudence to "presume innocent" until proved otherwise in a court of law balances the powers of the State. The State has found a way to fool the courts into unbalancing the balance by seeking to reverse the presumption for convenience in cases related to extremist threats. Often this becomes a concession granted to authorities-not-so-fair. Law becomes one-sided with such exceptions, not only in cases related to terrorism, but anything concerning 'national security' and sometimes in some countries for offenses purported to be related to drugs, There are extreme situations that do require a bit of flexibility, but such a provision for flexibility must be guaranteed not to be abused. While exceptions are handled with due and severe internal oversight in certain democracies, in India this is not likely to happen, nor would it be effective even if built into the system. ... contd.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.