Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Unfairly debarred by World Bank: Nestor

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Hitting out at the World Bank for 'unfairly' debarring it and terming the action as 'collusive practice', Delhi-based Nestor Pharmaceuticals said the firm would have taken the lending institution to court but for the immunity enjoyed by it.

    "We were unfairly debarred by the World Bank in 2007 for three years for unsubstantiated claims of 'collusive practices' for having the same price as that of a competitor in one tender out of the hundreds of tenders participated in," Nestor Pharmaceuticals President Rahul Sehgal said in a statement.

    He said, World Bank's action was based on complaints by the company's competitor who lost business to it as Nestor was supplying "the best quality medicines at the lowest prices under the Reproductive and Child Health projects".

    "Tender was not even decided and that there was no cause of action for such a debarment to have taken place...The scrutiny of the World Bank was insufficient and inconclusive and we have all documents to prove the same," Sehgal said.

    Ads by Google

    "Nestor would take the World Bank to court on account of this unfair treatment, which has resulted in damage to our reputation, but unfortunately the World Bank is immune to court action," he said.

    Sehgal claimed after Nestor was barred by the World Bank, India had to procure the same medicine that it used to provide at thrice the cost.

    "Truly speaking, the World Bank action against Nestor is actually tantamount to collusive practice as it prevents the government of India from purchasing good quality an affordable medicines," Sehgal said.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    Wipro's and Satyam's responses are identicalBy: Raj | 13-Jan-2009 Reply | Forward Satyam's founder said the same thing. he even wanted WB to apologize. Few days later, he accpeted corruption and resigned. Now, Wipro seems to be going in the same direction. Mera Bharat Mahan. Llet us cheat the whole world. Together, we can do it.
    World BankBy: Aravind | 13-Jan-2009 Reply | Forward The Government of India should involve and find out the truth. If World Bank really did victimize Indian companies, government should use its' channels and measures and protect at least fairness.
    World Bank ActionsBy: IS | 13-Jan-2009 Reply | Forward It seems the world Bank has been hasty in its debarrment procedures. If Wipros claim that it had obtained letters from the employees of non-conflict of intrest then it looks like the culprit may be the World Bank and its employees themselves and thats where the scutiny should start.I sincerely hope with all the AIG's, Exons and Murdoff etc of the world - Satyam incident is not blown out of proportion and become a witch-hunt effort against India
    World Bank above LawBy: Sunil Fotedar | 13-Jan-2009 Reply | Forward It's really a deplorable situation, knowing that world Bank can't be taken to court due to the immunity enjoyed by it. This is really a cause for worry as it can do anything to anyone without being asked for reasons. Law can't be held to ransom by World Bank. It needs to justify it's decisions.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.