Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Unfinished business

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • had not kept true faith with it.

    Of course, post-Emergency, the Supreme Court has amply redeemed itself by its pronouncements: and it has kept elected governments, and its ministers and officials in place. But be it remembered — all this, only post-Emergency!

    Malhotra says that whatever the Emergency’s faults “which were many and grievous, its biggest benefit is that it just can’t be repeated”. I am not so sanguine. In any case the reasoning in ADM Jabalpur could theoretically speaking be repeated. Because that decision has never been expressly overruled; strangely — and inexplicably during these

    34 years — it has never even been expressly dissented from.

    It is time we realised that the Constitution is not only for judges and lawyers, but for us citizens as well — for “the butcher, the baker and the candlestick maker” as Justice Vivian Bose eloquently put it in a celebrated judgment of the Supreme Court way back in 1954. It is only the spirit of constitutionalism amongst the people of this country that can save our liberties, and help preserve the integrity of our great country. We must all strive — the media in parti-cular — to nurture and propagate this spirit of constitutionalism, so that what happened between June 1975 and January 1977 can never happen again.

    Ads by Google

    The writer is an eminent jurist express@expressindia.com

    Previous1234
    Failure of System By: T S Asokraj | 14-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward In the initial stages of the working of the Constitution of India, we had M C Setalvad as Attorney General helped Supreme Court in laying down correct interpretation of various Constitutional provisions. Since then, failure jurists like Palkhiwala, Seervai, Fali Nariman to make it to Attorney General post is the single factor which resulted in Constitution getting skewed interpretation over the period.
    What affects the Judicial SystemBy: T S Asokraj | 14-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Apart from our Courts, over the period, failing to interpret Laws, in general, and the Constitution, in particular, as institutions bringing in consistency, the failure of jurists like Palkhiwala, Seervai and Nariman to adorn the post of Attorney General of India and help the highest Court of the land to lay down correct proposition of Laws and Constitution also contributed to the present mess in all branches fields of Law.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.