Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Unravelling the sari myth

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Long after the Japanese gave up their kimonos, the Chinese their Mao boiler suits and the South Americans their boleros, we Indian woman, whether at home or abroad, clung loyally to our saris. You saw doughty sari-clad Gujarati women on the top of the Matterhorn, on a safari in deepest Africa or river rafting on the Iguaçu. When curious American tourists inquired about the practicality of the garment, Indian women would wax eloquent on the marvels of the six metres of cloth. It was cool in summer, insulating in winter, never went out of fashion, never got out of shape and doubled as nightwear, a sheet or a picnic cloth.

    A tall tale retold for decades is that the sari is supremely comfortable. Examples are cited of the number of Indian women who play tennis, badminton and hockey in saris. And it is pointed out that in our villages women even go swimming in a sari. For most of us, however, the sari can start unravelling pretty fast when you exercise strenuously. And even without exercise, a woman tends to look like a dhobi bundle in a cotton sari if there is no starch in the fabric.

    Ads by Google

    Another myth about the sari is that it is a modest garment since it covers you from head to foot. American actor Bob Hope once joked that the "sari was one garment which hides both the good and the bad points of the figure." This is not true. Anyone who has seen an Indian movie with the heroine drenched in the rain in a diaphanous sari will tell you differently.

    ... contd.

    Next123
    Some other possible reasons younger women don't wear saris so much.By: Erika | 22-Sep-2009 Reply | Forward I suspect younger Indian women don't want to wear saris (in part) because the are perceived as "grandma garments" or as a country cousin costume. Globalisation means that younger, upwardly mobile women are exposed to images of "trendy" women wearing Western clothing: after a while this has an unconscious influence.Add to that the undoubtedly daunting task of ironing a sari and it is not surprising that younger Indian women are choosing other styles of clothing.Some of the other replies to this article have talked about comfort: there are two issues here, comfort and freedom of movement. I would say saris score well on the comfort scale but the Nivi drape scores fairly poorly on the freedom of movement scale - I wouldn't like to try to run in it or play sport. Both comfort and freedom of movement are relative, based on the individual's experience and expectations and size and shape. My ratings and perceptions are those of a Western woman who loves traditional saris.
    SariBy: abhi | 29-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward You cannot force anyone to wear anything. A woman decides what to wear and if she doesn’t wear sari no power in earth can do anything about it. No point in beating chests about culture. Culture evolves based on needs. Having said that, I feel that the sari enhances the beauty of an Indian woman by a very high degree. When my wife wears it, she looks like a goddess. When women in my office wear it, they look beautiful. In fact, I feel one of the reasons younger women don’t wear sarees is because it makes them look so adorable, and they would rather go about doing their work than attracting attention. Sari is something special for a woman. It makes her look more feminine. It is a feminine dress unlike pants and salwars which have been lifted out of men’s wardrobes. Hence its supreme charm.
    sari, no double standards By: Kavita | 17-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Mr. Mukund Kunte - your wife wore a Paithani to stand out at the Buck Palace. Good. What did YOU wear? A traditionally tied dhoti, and bare chest, I hope?! It helped the Mahatma stand out - so the nationalist thing for you to do would be to follow 'suit' and give up your suit, surely?! As for me - I'm a young woman who prefers the salwar kameez, which has the advantages of pants and yet can suit both casual and formal occasions. But that's not the point: the point is, why the burden on women to prove their cultural identity by wearing a sari? The sari is not the same as a burqa. but the BURDEN on women (reflected in many of the letters here) to wear your religion on your body is the same: be it for a sari or for a burqa! To say 'saris are not most convenient and pants/salwar/skirts may be preferred' is seen as 'trashy' and 'un-Indian' and 'anti-Hindu'. And this attitude is no different from those who say Muslim women who give up the burqa are not 'loyal' to their culture...
    sariBy: alka | 15-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Sari is a beautiful garment and actually very practical and comfortable for daily routine if you select right kind.These days sari is used only as fashion statement hence they have been made too complicated for routine use. Cotton saris without starch may not look very appealing to some but try wearing them at home and from personal experience I can tell you it is very comfortable.Of course Maratha style sari is just as good as Nivi(north indian)but it is not very popular because it is too revealing and does not look good on several body shapes. When you live in western country, you have to dress like women there in pants or skirts.Otherwise you stand out and get discriminated. Just like women in pants in India used to get dirty looks,and still do ,specially in rural areas.If you wear heavily embellished saris or ones with long threads on back side of woven design, it is not the fault of sari that you have problem.And the thought that Lehngas are Arabian,is totally crazy.
    Unravelling the sari mythBy: Vasoo Kamulkar, London | 13-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Dear Hrishikesh, Jhansi Ki Rani was a Maharashtrian queen who draped herself in a Maharashtrian Sadi (not sari) which was suitable for horse riding. Unlike the north Indians who just wrap their six-yard sadies around the waist, Maharashtrian women wore their nine-yard sadies in a lehenga fashion. One of the possible reasons as to why a Maharashtrian sadi uniquely differed from its North or South Indian counterpart could be its historical need. The Marhattas were always on their toes (or rather on the horse- backs) because of the scourge of the proselytising Muslim invaders. I remember the raised eyebrows in Pune, Panaji and Mumbai when my generation had started ‘indira-ing’ in the mid-fifties. Lamentably, the nine-yard sadi is fast disappearing. One could still see them in the rural parts of Maharashtra and Goa and in the Bollywood films, where, the Punjabi producers relish showing their kamwali bais always in Marathi sadies. {PartI}
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.