Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

UP goes to SC against HC order on sacked constables

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • The UP Government on Monday approached the Supreme Court challenging an Allahabad High Court order, which had directed the Government to reinstate “genuine” candidates out of the 22,000 sacked police constables who were allegedly recruited illegally during the earlier Mulayam Singh regime.

    Acting on its appeal, a vacation Bench comprising Justices Markandeya Katju and Deepak Verma issued a notice to the sacked constables — Pawan Kumar Singh and others.

    The High Court had passed the order on a petition filed by Singh and other sacked constables after taking a view that all the 22,000 constables could not be deemed to have been appointed illegally.

    Listing the matter for further hearing in July, the apex court also permitted UP to move an application before the High Court, which had initiated

    contempt proceedings against the state Government for not complying with its directions on the issue.

    Ads by Google

    The Mayawati Government filed the appeal after the High Court in March this year directed the state to segregate the “genuine” appointees from among the sacked constables and reinstate them.

    According to the UP Government, since the entire recruitment process conducted in 2005 by the then Mulayam Singh government was “vitiated”, it would not be appropriate to segregate the candidates for their reinstatement.

    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.