Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

UPA I to UPA II: PM ensures continuity in South Block

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Manmohan singh
    The tenure of National Security Advisor M K Narayanan has been extended until further order.

    Back as Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh has ensured continuity in South Block to help the transition from UPA I to UPA II.

    While tenures of National Security Advisor M K Narayanan and PM’s Principal Secretary T K A Kutty Nair have been extended until further orders, four Joint Secretaries have been given extended tenures of two more years — Vinni Mahajan (1987 batch, Punjab cadre) has been asked to continue till April 2011; R Gopalakrishnan (1978, Madhya Pradesh) till September 2011; Ashish Kumar Singh (1988, Maharashtra) till June 2011; and Sanjay Mitra (West Bengal, 1982) till November 2011. The only other Joint Secretary in the PMO is Pankaj Saran, a Foreign Service officer, whose tenure is yet to get over.

    PMO Secretary M N Prasad (1972, Bihar) is due to retire at the end of June. But his name is being considered for Member, UPSC on a fixed five-year tenure in place of former Civil Aviation Secretary K Roy Paul or for a year’s extension on contract. Prasad was even being considered for a fixed tenure of two years as Defence Secretary but present incumbent Vijay Singh retires on July 31, a month after Prasad.

    Ads by Google

    Since the appointments of two special envoys, Shyam Saran and Satinder Kumar Lambah, were till further orders, there is no change. They will continue to advise the PM on Climate Change and policy on Pakistan respectively.

    Incidentally, Pulok Chaterji, who was Secretary in the PMO and moved to World Bank as Executive Director before the Lok Sabha elections, met Manmohan Singh last week, sparking speculation that the 1974 batch UP cadre officer was returning to his old post in the PMO. Dr Sanjaya Baru, Prime Minister’s media advisor who moved to Singapore before the elections on personal grounds, also met Singh around the same time.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    South Block trioBy: vssubramaniam | 06-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward The (SB) Narayanan overstayed in the corridors of power, acting as a state within a state to cause much harm to India’s image. The Bombay fiasco occurred when Narayanan kept India’s security apparatus RAW busy, overflying the battle fronts in SL leaving the Bombay coastline totally exposed. Over the SL Tamil issue he totally alienated TN. His 'no fire zone', this brain child meant for the SL massacres to occur in utmost secrecy, without independent witnesses, to pre-stall potential SL war crimes proceedings failed when Tamil civilians who trustingly moved into the India blessed 'no fire zones' found them well planned 'massacres zones'. Gothabhaya Rajapakse in a Sunday Times interview named Narayanan/Menon as part of a trio ‘outside the Foreign Ministry (that) kept India in the loop during the fighting’ and liaised with the SL counterparts over the timing /details of the (May 16 to 19) massacres. Narayanan ensured RAW's involvement in the capture of the Ltte leadership including the civilian numbers for massacre politically acceptable to Delhi. RAW's over flights gave precise co-ordinates of the massacre targets. SL’s war crimes rubbed on to India here.
    business with rogueBy: kaberaa | 16-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward Ever since Sonia Gandhi came on the throne of India, we have been making most of our military purchases from the Americans. Knowing very well that Americans are unreliable business partners. They tend to change the rules of the game in the middle of the game. Hope! Sonia’s love for America is not more then her love for India.
    Singh is KingBy: SVS Subrahmaniam | 15-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward Singh is King and he will not do any mistakes and what ever he does is quite correct. That is my opinion on him and is of many Indian which is reflected in his reemergence as PM with more strength and vitality. I pray God to give him good health after his recent operation he had undergone. More than this, he has selected him or discarded some body has no relevance. Singh and Sonia duo has to work strongly for the betterment of the country. That is the hope the people of India decisively voted them to power.
    South Block weak establishmentBy: DPKarkara | 15-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward It is the prerogrative of the boss to select the team he can be comfortable with but the names mentioned donot inspire confidence. It further shows that the promises of the PM to ring in changes and effective measures to handle the problems of security, administrativew reforms, transparency and development at fast pace will not fructify. Keeping all old people around by giving extensions which some time ago the PM himself opposed will send wrong signals and reveal his lack of confidence in the civil services and his inability to choose talented people with vision and commitment. A sorry spectacle indeed. The worst part is that the country may come to feel that the PM is not 100% fit and and therefore has decide to keep old people around him as he may not be able to cope with a set of younger people.
    Foreign Policy going Awry.By: Ponkoh Sivakumaran | 15-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward There are problems with India's foreign policy. All commentators agree that China has stolen a march and encircled India. The Sri Lanka policy is the worst. The only allies in Sri Lanka, the Tamils have been alienated by the goons who manage foreign policy. The Sinhalese government which supported Pakistan during the Bangladesh war is now in the grip of China. The moral foreign policy which India followed since it condemned the South African policy of apartheid has now been given up in favour of a policy that what happens within a state is its internal problem. This will mean India cannot protest at Indians getting assaulted in Australia. It also means that the moral base of Indian foreign policy has been abandoned. It could be that this prevents scrutiny of army atrocities in the armed camp of Kashmir and encounter killings that are frequent. But, it is shortsighted and does not mesh in with the cultural traditions of the Indian people. It caters only to the protection of the rich.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.