Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

UPA’s Asia Strategy: One Step Forward, Two Steps Back?

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • The fact that India has signed a trade liberalization pact with South Korea this week might be more important than the specific contents of the agreement. India’s Asian well-wishers hope that in acting quickly on the Korean deal, the UPA government is signalling a strong commitment to East Asian regionalism.

    Amidst the prolonged and tortuous negotiations on the free trade agreement with the ASEAN, there has been a growing perception in East and Southeast Asia that India is not serious about building a sustainable economic partnership with the region.

    While our Foreign Office drafts fine speeches on India’s ‘ancient civilizational links’ with Asia, and our chattering classes talk incessantly about Delhi’s ‘central role’ in modern Asia, much of the region thinks India has only words to offer. Even those who backed India’s entry into Pacific Asian forums earlier in this decade now feel despondent.

    Ads by Google

    For example, during 2004-05, Japan, Singapore Indonesia insisted on the Indian membership of the East Asia Summit (EAS) and overcame Beijing’s stiff opposition to Delhi’s membership of the Asian project of regional integration.

    In retrospect China’s anxieties about India’s rising profile in East Asia seem excessive. There was no reason for Beijing to stop India if Delhi was determined to trip itself up in Asia.

    Although Delhi has joined the East Asian process, domestic political considerations have prevented it from seizing the opportunities that have come its way. India is now is the only major regional power that has not signed a free trade agreement with the ASEAN.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    Inculcating spirit of market economy and FTABy: N J Ramesh | 08-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward Technology acquisition and market development are exceedingly complex processes best left to corporates themselves. It is this basic premise of privacy of corporates to take their own investment decision which is bit alien to Indian politicians. The worse case scenario being IBM and Coco Cola exit during George Fernandes tenure as Industry Minister. The lighter shades of this is all too evident in almost all cases. Recent one in UPA-1 being imposing Intel Chip plant to come to one particular state only.
    Heavy electronics and an abstract vision By: N J Ramesh | 08-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward Indian technology base is very weak in heavy electronics. A term, for want of better one, is used here for Semiconductor production, manufacture of memory chips and VSLI chips, flat display panels, electronic instrumentation and mechatronic systems. Asean nations, Japan and Taiwan are giants in these domains, ahead of EU even. The post N-deal international scene and formation of UPA-II has finally created the eco-political climate, external and internal for major forward thurst to the abstract vision of Look East policy formulated almost two decades earlier by MMS. This trade and investment thurst in form of FTA would hopefully lead to rapid expansion in this domain where India has adequate complementary expertise in software and huge market potential to partner for rapid expansion and increased sophistication. The well intentioned expression of fear about India taking two steps back by Mr Raja Mohan is likely to be allayed.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.