Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Uphaar tragedy: Ansal brothers surrender in court

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • 59 people lost their lives in the Uphaar cinema hall fire tragedy in New Delhi on June 13, 1997.

    Real estate barons Sushil and Gopal Ansal on Thursday surrendered before a Delhi court in compliance with the Supreme Court order cancelling their bail in the case of Uphaar fire tragedy which claimed 59 lives.

    Ansal brothers surrendered before Additional Sessions Judge I K Kochhar at the Patiala House district courts.

    Two managers of the Uphaar theatre, Ajit Chowdhary and Nirmal Chopra, also surrendered before the court.

    All the four were directed by the apex Court on Wednesday to surrender before the trial court by 4 pm on Thursday. An apex court bench comprising Justices B N Agrawal and G S Singhvi had ordered their arrest after cancelling their bail.

    The apex Court while cancelling the bail of the convicts had taken a strong exception to the alleged tampering with the judicial records of the case by the accused persons.

    Ads by Google

    The bail of the convicts were cancelled on a petition filed by Association of Victims of Uphaar Tragedy (AVUT) challenging the order of the Delhi High Court.

    The trial court on November, 20, 2007 had convicted the Ansal brothers along with three others under Section 304-A IPC (causing death due to rash and negligent act) and had sentenced them to two years imprisonment.

    Seven others including Ajit Chowdhary and Nirmal Chopra, managers of the theatre whose bail was also cancelled on Wednesday, were convicted under Section 304 IPC (culpable homicide not amounting to murder) and sentenced to seven years imprisonment.

    Others convicted under section 304 IPC were – Radha Krishan Sharma, Manmohan Unniyal (cinema's gatekeeper), Brij Mohan Satija, A K Gera and Bir Singh (all DVB officials).

    ... contd.

    Next123
    Crime proved, Is it not?By: Paul Krist | 11-Sep-2008 Reply | Forward These people tried to remove incriminating files from a lower court to escape punishment. This alone is sufficient evidence and proof of their having confessed to their crime of killing too many members of the public with their gross negligence.
    AWARD R.I. FOR LIFE TO THESE MEN burning to death dozens and criminally trying to evade lawBy: MMK Rao | 11-Sep-2008 Reply | Forward It is extremely strange, to put it mildly, that a case involving big moneyed people along with their men, who caused the gory death of dozens of people, with their utter recklessness of management and grave unconcern for public's safety in their cinema theatre, should be dragging along, for more than a decade. This fact MUST not dilute the degree of severity of the punishment that must be meted out by rigorous life imprisonment of the people who dare, even at this stage, to escape from the arm of the law by criminal methods. THE PUBLIC DEMAND THAT THE MOST SEVEREST PUNISHMENT BE AWARDED TO THESE MEN AS A DETERRENT TO FUTURE RECKLESSNESS OF THIS MAGNITUDE.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.