US Judge dismisses Indian-origin law student's lawsuit against Preet Bharara
- IPL spot-fixing case: Net widens, police watching 3 more players, other bookies
- IPL 2013: Imperious Brad Hodge powers Rajasthan Royals to qualifier
- Sonia Gandhi, PM Manmohan Singh slam BJP for disrupting Parliament, stalling bills
- IPL spot-fixing: 'Bookie' Vindoo was close to BCCI chief's son-in-law, say cops
- Jessica Lall case: Shayan Munshi to face perjury trial
A US court here has dismissed a lawsuit filed by an Indian-origin law student against Manhattan's top federal prosecutor Preet Bharara and the Justice Department for unlawfully questioning her and seizing a phone during Rajat Gupta's insider trading trial.
Benula Bensam, 24, had filed a lawsuit against Bharara, federal prosecutors Reed Brodsky, Richard Tarlowe and the US Marshals Service in US District Court in July.
US District Judge Andrew Carter, however, dismissed the claims Bensam had filed against Bharara, Brodsky, Tarlow, Department of Justice and the US Marshals Service "for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted."
The law student had got into trouble during the Gupta trial in June after she sent three letters to presiding Judge Jed Rakoff on the case.
During one of the court proceedings in the trial, Bensam was escorted out of the courtroom by US Marshals and questioned over the letters she had sent to the judge.
She said in the lawsuit that the Marshals questioned her at length and refused to return her cell phone saying she could get it back only after she had answered all their questions.
The Marshals also attempted to take her picture with a mobile phone. Bensam also alleged that her phone had been tampered with by the court security.
In the lawsuit Bensam had alleged she was subject to "unreasonable search and seizure for unlawful stop, detention, interrogation, seizure of property, search of property, search of communications and demand for identification."
She is representing herself.
Carter said Bensam's only allegations against Brodsky and Tarlow are that they "knew of the letters [she] had written to Judge Rakoff" and "may have instigated the involvement of the US Marshals."
Similarly, Bensam's allegations that Bharara "may have instigated the involvement of the US Marshals," and "has advocated the use of intrusive surveillance" fail to state a claim that he failed to do anything that violated Bensam's rights, the judge ruled.
- Paddy shortfall blamed for mystery death of procurement officer
- 'Bookie' Vindoo was close to BCCI chief’s son-in-law: cops
- Net widens, police watching three more players, new set of bookies
- Suspected Islamists behead soldier on London street
- Malegaon 2006 case: NIA names four right wing terror suspects
- BJP invokes 'sarcasm, ridicule' against PM