Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

US Supreme Court spilt on execution by lethal injection

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Justice David Souter urged his colleagues to take the time necessary to issue a definitive decision about the three-drug method in this case, even if it means sending the case back to Kentucky for more study by courts there.

    Scalia, however, said such a move would mean “a national cessation of executions. We’re looking at years. We wouldn’t want that to happen.”

    Kentucky, backed by the Bush administration, says it works hard to execute inmates humanely, countering claims that its procedure violates a constitutional ban on cruel and unusual punishment.

    But Donald Verrilli, a Washington lawyer who is a veteran of death penalty cases, told the justices that problems with executions in California, North Carolina and other states show that the three-drug procedure should be scrapped or thoroughly revamped.

    “The risk here is real. That is why it is unlawful to euthanise animals the way Kentucky executes inmates,” Verrilli said. Kentucky bars the use of the paralytic on animals. An overdose of barbiturates is commonly used on animals.

    Ads by Google

    Previous12
    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.