Varsity held guilty of ‘unlawfully’
Related
Top Stories
- Former Ranji player held, Sreesanth and others to be produced in court today
- India, China have wisdom to address bounday issue: Li Keqiang
- All eyes on Narendra Modi as BJP set to discuss strategy for Lok Sabha polls
- In 7 lucrative minutes on May 9, Sreesanth bowled 6 balls, bookie made Rs 2.5 cr
- SC agrees to hear PIL to stay IPL matches due to spot-fixing
HC division Bench upheld an order passed by a single Bench, where the Court had slapped a penalty of Rs 10,000 on the University
HOLDING Panjab University guilty of acting "irresponsibly and unlawfully in pocketing the provident fund dues" of its former employee, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has expressed its disapproval against the University for "harassing" a retired employee.
A Division Bench comprising Justice Hemant Gupta and Justice Rajiv Narain Raina has also upheld an order passed by a single Bench, where the Court had slapped a penalty of Rs 10,000 on the University for "illegally" withholding the provident fund dues of Dr Iqbal Singh Dhillon, retired director and head of Youth Welfare Department.
The division bench has dismissed an appeal filed by the University against an order passed by a Single Bench where the Bench had directed the University to release the provident fund amount standing to the credit of Dhillon with simple interest at 18 per cent per annum.
Dhillon had served the University for nearly 27 years from 1987 to 2005. During his tenure, it was not disputed, the petitioner drew advances from grants and subsidies put at the disposal of the petitioner for onward disbursement to affiliated colleges to bear expenses of youth festivals.
There were audit objections with respect to 33 advances and 25 subsidies that remained unadjusted and unaccounted in the name of the petitioner. The petitioner was served with several notices to reconcile the accounts and finalise the same by accounting for the advances made to him. It was his case that from time to time he had furnished proof of fund utilisation, accounts adjustment and had submitted expenditure reports.
When the petitioner retired on reaching the age of superannuation on April 30, 2005, the amount lying in his PF account was withheld with a view to make deductions to satisfy the claims reflected in the audit objections.
... contd.
Editors’ Pick
- 'Sophisticated' Indian cyberattacks targeted Pak military sites: Report
- Talkative Li quoted Weber, Hegel, Jobs, said PM is large-hearted
- Bihar food corp ends up with chaff as rice worth Rs 535 cr vanishes from mills
- In 7 lucrative minutes on May 9, Sreesanth bowled 6 balls, bookie made Rs 2.5 cr
- India and China ask border envoys to work on more steps
- Former Ranji player among 3 more held
- Rajasthan Royals to file FIR against tainted trio
- Family of theft accused allege police torture
- IVF breakthrough can triple number of births: Scientists
- After Khalid’s death, Muslim leaders want govt to make Nimesh panel report public
- Meteoroid impact triggers bright flash on the moon
- Cobrapost sting: NABARD chief gives clean chit to co-operative banks


UBS proposes independent campus, SBI chairman donates Rs 1 cr to alma mater
Following altercation, UBS woman prof slaps sexual harassment case against 2 colleagues
Life of Pi singer Bombay Jayashri to perform in Chandigarh
Theories of Sino-India war far-fetched, says ex-Army chief


















