Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Waiting for Holbrooke

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • As the US Special Representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan, Richard Holbrooke, prepares for his first visit to South Asia, New Delhi should be ready to offer the Obama administration a grand bargain on regional security.

    The purpose of New Delhi’s successful lobbying effort in Washington to remove India and Kashmir from Holbrooke’s South Asia mandate — which has received some breathless commentary from Washington’s Beltway — was not about avoiding an engagement with the Obama administration on the regional conflicts. The more astute among Washington’s analysts have figured out India’s real aim — to generate the right atmosphere for a sustained and comprehensive Indo-US conversation on how to stabilise the lawless lands between the Indus and the Hindu Kush.

    After the positive gesture from the Obama administration, it is New Delhi’s turn to reciprocate by offering to work out a framework for mutually beneficial regional security cooperation. If Washington is ready to press Islamabad to abandon for ever its instrumentalisation of terror and extremism, India will certainly be willing to help the United States in managing the profound threats to its national security from the borderlands of Pakistan and Afghanistan. Once New Delhi and Washington recognise their shared interests in stabilising and modernising Afghanistan and Pakistan, the template for give and take presents itself.

    Ads by Google

    Any suggestion of an Indo-US deal on regional security would horrify the conventional wisdom in New Delhi and Washington. This is not surprising, since Pakistan has been at the very heart of the security divergence between India and the US for all these decades. We might, however, recall how wrong the conventional wisdom in both the capitals was on the nuclear question — the other critical contention between India and the US. Having achieved the seemingly impossible goal of nuclear reconciliation with the US under the Bush administration, India must have a shot at working with the Obama administration in transforming India’s north-western frontiers.

    ... contd.

    Next1234
    messageBy: rohit chandavarker | 01-Feb-2009 Reply | Forward It would be an exercise in futility to engage Holbrooke in discussions re Pak.When the avowed doctrine of Pak is using terror as an instrument of state policy how is US going to change a doctrine so fundamental to the psyche of Pak?Also how much leverage has the US got over the Pak establishment which seems reclacitrant to the world demands?However India cud play a active role in Afghanistan as this wud unsettle Pak especially if we decide to station troops there to help restore peace.But with a change of guard in Delhi shortly I wonder whether a consistent policy will be pursued knowing the politicians penchant for changing course regularly.
    Can US help?By: Raj Bhadra Singh | 01-Feb-2009 Reply | Forward US neither has leverage nor intention to help India and Pakistan sort out this issue. It will be focussed on achieving its limited goal of exiting Afghanistan with some self respect intact. It will weave a web of warm insincerities to bluff India in pursuing a policy that gives Pakistan no justification to avoid immediate actions required to tame Taliban and hence bail out US. Once US achieves its limited objectives it will return to its old games of giving lectures on self determination and human rights. Indian response is to be based on this cynical assessment of US intents rather than getting carried away by one missing reference to Kashmir in some vague statement. Question India should pose to the world- Is it ready for change in borders based on the principle of self-determination? If so is this to be applied selectively at some regions just because the people demanding this right in these regions are able to unleash violence?
    PakistanBy: Gulbagh Singh | 01-Feb-2009 Reply | Forward Riversand - you are such an ignorant of history or you are in denial as Pak. Govt. is. You people can not grow and always give in your own world of hate against India.
    help contruct EBy: Kannan | 31-Jan-2009 Reply | Forward "help the US construct secure and legitimate borders for Pakistan on its eastern and western frontiers. "Are you kidding me..Pakis will be a pain in the ass in any form or shape. Pakiland must be systematically dismembered into harmless parts..or better which fights with each other..like Arabs..If Israel is not there in the middle-east as a unifying factor..Arabs would have long killed each other to extinction and made world a safer place to live in. So like they say..Israel is the "problem"
    Why????By: rangeela re | 31-Jan-2009 Reply | Forward america is no one's friend, they are interested in gettig out of afghanistan to help their own economy hence the suggestion through the media for india to become an equal player with america. getting involved in afghanistan at the instance of america and not on invitation of a stable afghan govt or afghani people is suicide. Next about pakistan, lot of water has flowed since 1947, the national character of pakistan is based on anti-india. For india's well being in the long run, pakistan cannot be allowed to exist. PERIOD. Dismantle pakistan into manageable pieces of assimilate it into india. Otherwise we will one day see nuclear blackmail.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.