Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Water being diverted to Lavasa, alleges Patkar

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • “Puneites are facing water scarcity at the cost of Union Agriculture Minister Sharad Pawar and his family members including State Irrigation Minister Ajit Pawar who have conveniently diverted water from Warasgaon dam to Lavasa Corporation Limited,” said social activist Medha Patkar on Tuesday.

    “Pune population requires about 11.5 TMC water and the capacity of Warasgaon dam is also about 11.5 TMC. While Lavasa Corporation has illegally acquired permissions to get 1.5 TMC water (10 percent) from Warasgaon dam, it is unclear whether this water will be used for the 5,000 acres of presently approved project or for the 25,000 acres of the total hill city area of Lavasa,” she said.

    Patkar, who is also the head of National Alliance for People’s Movements (NAPM), was speaking at a press meet held here. She said that Lavasa Lake City is expected to have 1.5 lakh residents for whom water will be needed. “Other than that, the project also includes hotels, recreation and water sports as well as large amount of Ayurevdic plans and herbs plantation, as claimed on Lavasa website, that will need water. Considering this, acquiring permission for diverting 1.5 TMC water seems just the beginning,” Patkar said.

    Ads by Google

    She went on to say that eight dams are being constructed at the source of Warasgaon dam, while two smaller dams in the backwaters. Also, about 90 small streams have been diverted and are being projected as tourist attraction. Patkar also said, “While the government had the largest share in Lavasa, in terms of not only money but also the land and water, Ajit Gulabchand, chairman and managing director, Hindustan Construction Company (HCC) has about 65 percent stake in the project.”

    “It is time that Puneites understand that on one hand is their need of drinking, domestic and irrigation water, while on the other is the requirement of water for international hotels and recreation sports that are being planned in Lavasa,” she said. Activist from Maval Maruti Bhapkar too said that when Puneites raised their voice to save their hills, they must show similar aggression to ensure that water meant for them will not be diverted for the profit of a handful and businessmen and politicians.

    Patkar referred to the inquiry report on land deals in Pune prepared by People’s Commission of inquiry led by NAPM and said that Lavasa project is not just exploiting water meant for Puneites, but also the land, flora and fauna. NAPM Sachin Choudhary pointed out that about one crore trees were cut down for the purpose of the project. “There have been instances where the project got permissions from the irrigation department within just two days,” he said.

    Patkar said, “We have submitted the report to the government and as of now, we are politely requesting them to start inquiry about the wrongdoings of this project. We will have to take to other measures if the government continues to remain silent,” she said.

    medha patkar - real or faker?By: mahendra kamath | 04-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward Why Ms. Medha Patkar is seen hampering only the developmental projects? Where was Ms. Patkar when so many farmers were affected due to earthquake and tsunami? What benefit is she really getting in such movements?These and more are the prime questions that arise in Ms. Patkar's all the movements. These projects are bringing in jobs, money and prosperity to such regions which had no demand at all in past. Ms. Patkar too knows well that the Lavasa project has a huge budget for community development of the local villagers. Still why is she cribbing about the issue over and over again? Is it for money, or popularity, or politics? If she is really working for the villagers and farmers, then why we don't see any developmental activities carried out for them by Ms. Patkar, other than agitations? Ms. Patkar can afford to travel around the globe and attend interviews. Then why she can't afford to help out the so-called "affected" people rather than hampering all the developmental projects ???
    Medha Patkar - real or fakerBy: mahendra kamath | 04-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward Why Ms. Medha Patkar is seen hampering only the developmental projects? Where was Ms. Patkar when so many farmers were affected due to earthquake and tsunami? What benefit is she really getting in such movements?These and more are the prime questions that arise in Ms. Patkar's all the movements. These projects are bringing in jobs, money and prosperity to such regions which had no demand at all in past. Ms. Patkar too knows well that the Lavasa project has a huge budget for community development of the local villagers. Still why is she cribbing about the issue over and over again? Is it for money, or popularity, or politics? If she is really working for the villagers and farmers, then why we don't see any developmental activities carried out for them by Ms. Patkar, other than agitations? Ms. Patkar can afford to travel around the globe and attend interviews. Then why she can't afford to help out the so-called "affected" people rather than hampering all the developmental projects ???
    Why is this Ms Patkar so anti-developmentBy: Mohit | 14-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Medha Patkar is anti development. First it was Narmada - the benefits from the project are for everyone to see. Then it was Singur - (set WB back in my opinion).
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.