Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
Search
You are here: IE »   Story

Waugh notices Oz dilemma

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • It might be a peaceful opening day of the third Test between India and Australia, but former Australian skipper Steve Waugh feels the ghost of the acrimonious Sydney Test was still in the minds of the hosts as their appealing was not that convincing.

    Waugh cited the incident when Adam Gilchrist took a catch on his left that came off the arm guard of Wasim Jaffer but looked in a dilemma whether to go for a loud appeal. “They were appealing with great gusto and then suddenly they weren’t. They were not quite sure what to do, an obvious postscript to the scrutiny of the side’s behaviour in the Sydney Test,” Waugh wrote in the Courier Mail.

    “Gilly had an anguished look that probably came from the fact that from behind the wicket there is no way he would have known whether the ball had hit bat or arm guard yet he was quite entitled to ask the question. You could see the concern on Gilly’s face as the episode was played out,” the former skipper wrote. He also felt that Indian offie Harbhajan Singh could have done well on the WACA track.

    “Spinners can profit here but ones who rely on bounce, such as Harbhajan Singh, are normally a better bet,” he said.

    Express Specials
    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.