Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Weight of the case

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • November 30, 2006 was a big day for the Anti-Terrorist Squad. After 142 days of the 7/11 blasts, around 10 officers in uniform and badges lugged 13 copies of the gargantuan 10, 667-page chargesheet in black shopping bags for the 13 accused. The 15-odd ATS officers in the MCOCA court looked positively triumphant.

    Deputy Commissioner of Police Naval Bajaj engaged TV crews with precise sound bites: “166 ATS officers, including four assistant commissioners of police, 15 police inspectors, 17 assistant police inspectors and 34 police sub-inspectors and 96 constables and…134 zonal officers were involved in doing the ground verification. 3,82, 548 man hours have been spent in the investigation…”

    Lawyers and police officers experienced a flashback of sorts — November 4, 1993, when the chargesheet in the serial bomb blasts was filed. “It was an unprecedented case. We had got two lorries full of chargesheets filled in gunnysacks meant for rice or sugar. Judge JN Patel then had called each of the 134 accused to the dock and asked them to pick up a copy of the chargesheet. The sacks were so heavy that the accused would struggle to get it off the dock. It was a very amusing sight,” recalls S Walishetty, one of the chief investigating officers of the 1993 bomb blast case before the CBI took over.

    Ads by Google

    That, and perhaps, the language and tenor is where the similarities end. Seemingly inspired by the 1993 chargesheet, this one begins with an exhaustive description of the 7/11 blasts. It then tries to explain the entire conspiracy of the blasts, allegedly hatched in 1999 by absconding accused Azam Cheema, Faisal Shaikh and Asif Khan alias Junaid for waging war with the nation and speading terror.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.