Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

What a difference a day made

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • It sang out across channels: ‘Singh is king, Singh is king’, a salute Manmohan Singh last heard after the nuclear vote of confidence last summer. Suddenly, he was the flavour of the day, once more. Aaj Tak neatly summed up the election result in a graphic of the ‘weakest Prime Minister’ with a highly developed gladiatorial physique seated in a chariot, bow and arrow in hand with Rahul Gandhi sounding the victory conch and Sonia Gandhi at the helm.  

    Something of a surprise to the average viewer who had been led to expect from coverage before last week’s exit polls that UPA was just a nose ahead of NDA. Up to last Wednesday, the coverage had alternated between debates on campaign speeches — in particular, who said what about whom — and debates on who thought they might become prime minister in a coalition government not led by NDA (answer, everyone but Prakash Karat!). Why, we began to expect a cabinet of prime ministers from different political persuasions. 

    Ads by Google

    Then, the exit polls or ‘projections’. These unanimously gave UPA the lead. Star News, CNN-IBN and NDTV crossed 200 for the UPA. This led to discussions on every conceivable political permutation to ‘Catch 272’ as Headlines Today winsomely put it, right up until Saturday 8 am when the countdown began. And then pouf! All the possibilities that had been explored in depth like a prehistoric excavation, were instantly buried under the decisive results.  

    So, the polls had pointed in the right direction but none came close to the final tally. In the event, they did exercise abundant caution: Prannoy Roy issued a continuous health warning, saying a one per cent margin of error could result in 20 seats this way and that (NDTV 24 x7), Yogendra Yadav qualified everything he said continually (CNN-IBN) while Arnab Goswami projected numbers that were not based, he said, on an exit poll at all, so there (Times Now).   

    Counting day: a clear difference between Hindi news and English news. The Hindi channels kept it simple: an anchor, a commentator, one political guest and let the numbers speak for themselves. English news, other than Headlines Today, had large expert panels reflecting every shade of opinion. Times Now had such a rainbow there were more than 10 people at a time. Variety yes, coherence no, as many spoke — or shouted— simultaneously. NDTV and CNN-IBN experimented with academics alongside journalists. A good idea, but did it work? Hmmmn. Meanwhile, Lok Sabha channel buzzed with activity — activity generated not by the election results but a spot of exercising with a former MP on Fitness Mantra: “happiness” it proclaimed “is a tonic — keep smiling”. It’s only after ten that it decided to join the count, that too in armchair fashion with Suneet Tandon. 

    Colour schemes and graphics: crucial, what with multiple numbers, rolling text, breaking news all at once. On looks our vote goes to News X (blue and white chart) and Zee News (blue and grey for a variation) as the most eye-soothing, CNN-IBN as the most traditional (blue, red and white), NDTV the most innovative (pale gold and black) and India TV, true to its brand, the most shocking in red, black and white. The graphics were best on NDTV. 

    In an election show, the first thing that matters are the numbers: as always, each channel had a different count — DD was particularly slow and Times Now was behind CNN-IBN, Headlines Today or NDTV — but since the leads were clear very early on it didn’t seem to matter.   

    The magic box, screen call it what you will, made an impressive debut on all channels. It was a touch away from the itching fingers of TV anchors — though it didn’t always respond to stimuli. NDTV’s touch map was an eco-friendly green but you couldn’t see anything. Still, it was a good beginning. 

    On Sunday, Praful Patel suggested on NDTV 24x7 that TV news coverage of the elections had been ‘entertainment’. That it was: we enjoyed the tamasha, but did you ever feel, during the entire coverage that you knew what the mood was in the country?

    shailaja.bajpai@expressindia.com

    TV Channels and ELECTION RESULTS:By: TV Kumar | 24-May-2009 Reply | Forward For an excellent analysis by IE veteran columnist on media and election results, Shailja deserves kudos. However, the author missed mentioning certain apparent bias shown by a popular TV Channel's senior reporters to suggest the leanings towards a particular party. Journalistic norms say that they should just present 'news' and facts devoid of their personal likes/dislikes/leanings if any?
    phony cacophonyBy: B.V.SHENOY | 20-May-2009 Reply | Forward Dwaraknath above is right. One "expert" editor on the panel of Timesnow channel called Jaswanth Singh anti-national, just because Jaswanth has espoused the cause of the Gorkhaland state, which this expert believed is secessionist! This editor was too happy, though too early and hasty that he declared Jaswanth Singh defeated!!
    Polls and journalismBy: G.Dwarakanath | 20-May-2009 Reply | Forward Two points are missing in this otherwise excellent summing up of how the news channels covered the election results. The anchors made an absolute nuisance of of themselves. They made us feel that just the results on the screes were enough and not their noisy analyses. The other point is total lack of objectivity. What is it, many may ask. Go to a library and see how the newspapers reported election results upto the 1967 elections. Many stalwarts often lost the poll, but no newspaper reported that they bit the dust and so on. They remained prominent and were respected as before. Jyoti Basu or Advani cannot become non-entities because of electoral reverses nor can Manmohan Singh and Sonia Gandhi become instant geniuses. It is sad to see the psychophancy and partisanship that mark the reporting of elections today.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.