Thomas L. Friedman

The agony of Syria


Thomas L. Friedman

What if post-election Fed were shackled?

Ads by Google
Mit

Investors staring squarely at the US fiscal cliff may well be ignoring a bigger monetary policy pitfall.

Many asset managers are puzzled at the how little attention world markets seem to have paid to the U.S. Republican party's stiff criticism of the hyper-active Federal Reserve and its successive bouts of reflationary money printing since 2008.

Given the scale of support the Fed - along with the European Central Bank, Japanese and British central banks - continue to provide global asset prices, then it's remarkable how little markets have been ruffled by next month's tight election race.

This past week's first of three U.S. presidential debates was a starting gun for a month of intense electioneering that is at least starting to focus minds on how markets may behave around the Nov. 6 poll.

To date, most of the talk has been how quickly the next president and new congressional constellation can dodge the looming fiscal cliff, where $600 billion in spending cuts and expiring tax relief - some 4 percent of U.S. output - kicks in automatically next year without a wider budget agreement.

But with such an agreement as dependent on the makeup of the House and Senate as the occupier of the White House, this budgetary uncertainty has been parked in watch, wait and see mode until the election outcome becomes clearer.

The running assumption is that one form of 'gridlock' prevails and a deal gets thrashed out in time. On balance, the polls point to incumbent Democrat Barack Obama retaking the presidency, Republicans the House, and the Senate up for grabs.

But if Republican challenger Mitt Romney's strong showing in the first debate on Wednesday night translates into opinion poll gains both nationally and in key swing states, then the prospect of a clean sweep for Republicans may have to be priced into markets rather quickly.

... contd.

Ads by Google
Please read our terms of use before posting comments
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
comments powered by Disqus