What the UDRS baiters’ are saying: ‘costly, monopoly product’
- India, China call for end to incursion issue, sign 8 deals to boost ties
- Aarushi murder case: Rajesh Talwar claims he was asleep when killings took place
- Railgate: BJP protests against CBI DIG for shielding Pawan Bansal
- Spot-Fixing: Sreesanth reveals bookies lured India players with cars, women
- Jagan Reddy case: Accused Andhra ministers Sabitha, Dharmana Rao resign
"The cost of bringing the technology to India is sky high. Plus, if there is a match between India and Sri Lanka in Sri Lanka, we have to go back to the only owners to set up the cameras in the stadium — it is a monopoly technology. That does not make much sense to the Indian board," he said.
Adapted for TV only by BBG Sports, an Australian company, the cost of implementing it in every Test match is very, very expensive. BBG Sports charges close to $6000 per day for installing two thermal cameras and $10,000 for four. Although its usage will increase accuracy and decision transparency even further, both the BCCI and the Indian broadcasters are unwilling to foot the cost to standardise the system.
In their quest to make technology a permanent feature in all international cricket matches, the ICC have left the most important stone unturned – the cost of doing so. Ever since technology first made its way into cricket, the most frequently asked question by both the viewers and those involved in the game has been – who is responsible for ensuring that the technology makes its way into the cricket ground for the upcoming series. Should it be the a) ICC, the parent board, or b) the home board, the BCCI?
The answer, at least in other parts of the world, so far has been c) the broadcasters. While Australia's Nine Network introduced Hot Spot to the world during the 2006-07 Ashes series, it has been used sparingly ever since. Despite the fact that technology was made compulsory during the recently concluded World Cup, the most accurate reviewal system was missing due to ICC's unwillingness to pay for its expensive usage. And according to Warren Brennan, the owner of BBG Sports, the reasons were simple. "If the cricket boards want a feed of that for adjudication purposes, they should contribute to the costs. Otherwise, the Ashes could well be the last hurrah."
But according to the BCCI source, it was the complications in bringing a military technology to India that ensured that the World Cup would go Hot Spot-less. "The Hot Spot system is used for military operations and warfare. In the subcontinent, we cannot keep it lying around in a stadium, for it may just get stolen," the source added.
- Former Ranji player among 3 more held
- Rajasthan Royals to file FIR against tainted trio
- If found guilty, BCCI to ask ICC to erase Sreesanth records
- Top cops among 42 named in death of blast accused
- Manmohan-Li talks: PM takes tough line on incursion issue
- Security forces blame Maoists, villagers say CoBRA man was killed in 'friendly fire'