Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

What the world is reading

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • As expected, the worldwide market crash made news and views. The Economist and Newsweek led with the subject, their focus somewhat different. The Economist’s ‘It’s Rough Out There’, says that during the first three weeks of January, “more than $5 trillion has disappeared from the value of public companies”. The Federal Reserve announced a rate cut of three-quarters of a percentage point and there’s a multi-billion-dollar rescue mission of bond insurers on the way. The Economist questions the sagacity of these moves. “Reacting to market panic with panicky rate cuts is likely to make things worse rather than better. The Fed should always be the calm centre of a financial storm.”

    Newsweek predicts: “The US Economy Faces the Guillotine”. “The Great Global Market Freak-Out of 2008 has everyone asking whether the United States—already on the road to recession—is entering into a protracted period of economic trouble.” No, it’s not the Depression, Nouriel Roubini, professor of economics at New York University’s Stern School of Business tells Newsweek, “But in terms of systemic risk and the risks of a financial meltdown, you almost have to go back that far to find a good analogy.”

    Ads by Google

    Newsweek describes the malaise in psychological terms: “Judging by the recent mood swings, the global economy can be diagnosed as manic-depressive”. Still, there is hope for others, all because of what economists call “decoupling.” Decoupling? “Even as the globe’s economic engine, the US, has stalled, optimists believe the train cars it has been pulling for the last several decades, especially emerging markets like India and China may finally be able to chug.”

    Two thoughtful articles related to India appear in The Economist and The New Yorker. The former looks at a new “Indian mutiny” in Malaysia. It argues that Indians have lost faith in the country’s social contract. “The two minorities (Chinese and Indian) were given citizenship in return for accepting that ethnic Malays and other indigenous groups, would enjoy privileged access to state jobs and education. But whereas the majority population have, with official help, started catching up with the Chinese... the Indians still have few assets.” Furthermore, “creeping Islamisation” has led to attacks during Hindu festivals and on temples. This could lead to a violent confrontation between the races.

    The New Yorker say yes to Nano and ‘The Tata Invasion’. James Surowiecki explains that when the company bid for Jaguar and unveiled the cheapest car in the world, everyone asked “Who?” Tata has made most of its fortune at home and in developing economies, “while selling to people who are still pretty poor.” This marks a fundamental change from the past: “Today, the economies of developing countries are still only a fraction of the size of Western economies, but many nonetheless have growing middle and upper classes with disposable income”. For Americans and Europeans who are shocked by the cheek of it all, Surowiecki has a cautionary reminder: “When we persuaded developing countries to open their doors to us, we also opened our doors to them. Now they’re walking through.”

    Time magazine is feeling less than romantic. In its cover story “Science of Love”, it reduces that four letter emotion to a combination of smell, taste and “oxytocin”. “If ever there was a substance designed to bind (couples), it’s oxytocin.”

    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.