Nothing makes this clearer than the release of the repulsive Sayeed the day before our Prime Minister was due to meet the Prime Minister of Pakistan in Egypt last week. It should have been at this point that Dr Manmohan Singh announced his inability to have even two minutes of conversation with Mr Yousaf Raza Geelani but he chose not to. He sat meekly through a long meeting with the Pakistani Prime Minister and then acquiesced to a joint statement that implied that India was supporting terrorism in Balochistan.

Ever since the attack on Mumbai I have been hearing from Pakistani friends a half-hearted justification for Mumbai on the grounds that ‘you also are doing things in Balochistan’. Whenever I have heard this, I have pointed out that if India had the ability to get up to some serious subversive activity in Pakistan, we would be decimating Islamists, not promoting their activities. Any fool should be able to see that it is in India’s interests for the Pakistani state (such as it is) to remain in control of its nuclear weapons and not let them slip into the hands of bearded fanatics bred on a hatred of ‘Hindu India’.

We would help the Pakistan government fight the Islamists if we could be sure that the fight was sincere. It cannot be if the Pakistani government finds it so hard to keep the founder of the Lashkar-e-Toiba in jail. The Lashkar was created with the sole purpose of promoting jihadi terrorism. That makes it a terrorist organisation and it makes its founder a terrorist. What more proof is needed to arrest Sayeed?

This is what I would like to have heard our Prime Minister say after the meeting in Sharm-ul-Sheikh. Instead he came up with that puzzling distinction between talking and dialogue. There will be talks between India and Pakistan but no dialogue. So will we be talking to the walls?

Our problem with Pakistan is no longer Kashmir. That movement for ‘azaadi’ was subsumed long years ago by the worldwide jihad and nothing proved this more definitely than the attack on Mumbai. This is why that attack remains so important. There have been other terrorist attacks on Indian soil but what happened in Mumbai was not just another Islamist terrorist attack, it was an act of war. There is evidence that the men who were guiding Kasab and his pals were based in Pakistan and there is evidence that some of them were serving officers in the Pakistani Army. Nobody who has heard the chilling conversations between the terrorists and their Pakistani masters can forget the cold-blooded evil of every instruction. Now stand them up and shoot them in the back of their heads. Kill as many people as you can.

The men who gave these instructions are still alive and free in Pakistan and there is no indication that the Pakistani government is doing anything to bring them to justice.

If we go ahead with ‘talks’, then this is the only thing we need to talk to Pakistan about. Where are these men? Who are they? Is it not true that the attack was planned and executed by the Lashkar-e-Toiba? Is this ghastly organisation being protected only because it is a division of the Pakistani Army?

Unless we get some answers, there is not the faintest possibility of the peace process moving forwards. We cannot talk about Kashmir because there is no point in talking about it when the attack on Mumbai makes it so abundantly obvious that the objective of the jihad is not to win Kashmir but to destroy India. While Pakistan has remained stuck in an Islamic time warp, India has moved on and embraced modernity and the changing realities of a rapidly changing world. We have our problems but they are 21st century problems not problems mired in 7th century Arabia. It is this changed India that Pakistan cannot deal with and this is why the jihad, this is why the attack on Mumbai and this is why there is no point in talking to Pakistan until it provides us with some evidence that it too wants to change.