Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

When hawks turn moral

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • K. Subrahmanyam

    It is one of the big ironies of the moment. There is now a vigorous debate in India about our right to conduct nuclear tests, if we consider them necessary, and the risks of our nuclear arsenal being capped short of our credible minimum deterrence requirement if we go ahead with 123 Agreement with the United States. In the US, four veteran strategists, Henry Kissinger, George Schulz, William Perry and Senator Sam Nunn are urging their country to take the initiative to move towards a nuclear weapon free world.

    On January 4, 2007 these four statesmen wrote an essay in The Wall Street Journal calling for a global effort to reduce reliance on nuclear weapons, to prevent their spread into potentially dangerous hands and ultimately to end them as a threat to the world. Up to the end of the eighties India used to urge nuclear disarmament and the US used to stress the need for nuclear weapons.

    Ads by Google

    Now after a year, on January 15, the four statesmen have returned to the theme, again in The Wall Street Journal. They claim to have received positive responses from all over the world for their earlier initiative. The list of people who have endorsed the idea reads almost like the list of the people who are now alive among the Americans who originally contributed to the building of the US nuclear arsenal to the obscene levels it reached in the eighties.

    The four US statesmen have developed the ideas they had put forward in a preliminary way last year. They have now urged that the provisions of the START treaty of 1991 should be extended, the reductions agreed upon in the 2002 Moscow treaty should be completed, and steps should be taken to increase the warning and decision time for the launch of all nuclear armed missiles. They draw attention to new threats arising out of developments in cyber warfare that could have disastrous consequences to the command and control systems. They advocate discarding any existing plans for massive attacks and term deterrence based on mutual assured destruction an obsolete policy in today’s world. They urge negotiations towards developing cooperative multilateral ballistic missile defence and early warning systems. They demand dramatically accelerated work to provide the highest possible standards of security for nuclear weapons and nuclear materials all over the world. They favour strengthening the means of monitoring compliance with the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty as a counter to a global spread of advanced technologies. Above all, they plead for bringing into effect the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty.

    ... contd.

    Next1234
    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.