When Narasimha Rao kept postponing an official visit to B'desh
Related
Top Stories
- IPL spot-fixing case: Actor Vindoo Dara Singh arrested in Mumbai
- Supreme Court rules out ban on IPL matches, slams BCCI over spot-fixing
- Li Keqiang pitches for more Chinese investments as he backs trade balance
- Narendra Modi holds talks with Advani ahead of BJP's strategy meeting in Delhi
- Aarushi murder case: HC rejects Talwars' plea to examine 14 witnesses

PV Narasimha Rao never went to Bangladesh on an official bilateral visit as Prime Minister to avoid the "embarrassment" of being confronted with the Farakka barrage issue for which he had no solution to offer, says former Foreign Secretary Muchkund Dubey.
In his soon-to-be-released book "India's Foreign Policy: Coping with the Changing World", Dubey writes that Rao kept "postponing an official visit to Bangladesh, ultimately not paying such a visit during his entire five-year tenure from 1991-1996.
"The reason for this given by him privately was that the Bangladesh government would raise during the visit, the issue of the distribution of water at Farakka, which would put him in an embarrassing situation because he had no solution to offer."
Rao visited Dhaka as prime minister in 1994 to attend the SAARC summit, a multilateral event.
The contentious issue of sharing of Ganga waters and the Farakka barrage on the river had been a major irritant in Indo-Bangladesh ties until a water-sharing agreement was signed in 1996.
Dubey, a former Indian High Commissioner to Bangladesh (1979-82), says that Rao's logic was "hardly convincing".
"We are destined to have difficult and at times, seemingly intractable bilateral problems with our neighbours. This cannot be a valid excuse for abjuring or keeping in abeyance summit-level contacts and dialogues which have come to be recognised as an effective means of removing mistrust and suspicion and laying the basis for resolving bilateral issues.
"If there were any diplomatic designs behind these postponements of dialogue, they were never articulated explicitly and publicly. They, therefore, did not serve any purpose except being viewed as instances of India's arbitrary and overbearing demeanour," he writes.
Editors’ Pick
- 'Sophisticated' Indian cyberattacks targeted Pak military sites: Report
- Talkative Li quoted Weber, Hegel, Jobs, said PM is large-hearted
- Bihar food corp ends up with chaff as rice worth Rs 535 cr vanishes from mills
- In 7 lucrative minutes on May 9, Sreesanth bowled 6 balls, bookie made Rs 2.5 cr
- India and China ask border envoys to work on more steps
- Former Ranji player among 3 more held
- Rajasthan Royals to file FIR against tainted trio
- Family of theft accused allege police torture
- After Khalid’s death, Muslim leaders want govt to make Nimesh panel report public
- Meteoroid impact triggers bright flash on the moon
- Cobrapost sting: NABARD chief gives clean chit to co-operative banks
- Google Maps leads Chinese man abducted 23 years ago back home


The dramatic rise and fall of Ashwani Kumar
Cornered Congress fires Ashwani Kumar, Pawan Kumar Bansal
Slow rise, fast fall for P K Bansal
Ishrat Jahan encounter case: Cops protecting accused, says Gujarat HC




















