—M. Ratan, New Delhi

TV monitor

* This refers to ‘Terror vision: live and so terribly inclusive’ and ‘Eyes on terror’. The suggestions made about a prospective debate on the role of TV news, the training of reporters and a law regulating them are valid. What is not understood is the slow response of the authorities to stop live coverage. TV channels symbolised their arrogance and desperation on the one hand and the meek, uncoordinated response of the government on the other.

—Kiran Bhagwat, Pune

Call to unite

* Terrorism is a national issue. There is an urgent need to create a Central agency to deal firmly and quickly with terrorism, whether aided by a foreign state or perpetrated by a terrorist outfit like the LeT. This can and should be done by an ordinance, to be ratified within six months. If the PM and the leader of the opposition are united in eliminating terrorism, this act could be passed with a thumping majority in Parliament.

—Parimal Y. Mehta, Mumbai

Words to action

* In the wake of the recent terror attacks in Mumbai, the PM has warned a neighbouring country against indulging in a proxy war with India. He has also subtly hinted at adopting some stern measures to end the menace of cross-border extremism. However, it remains to be seen as to how and when these words will get translated into concrete action.

—Arun Malankar, Mumbai

Coastal security

* The course of events that has unfolded before our eyes over the last few days is indeed bewildering. The unbelievable attacks on Mumbai have redefined tragedy and insecurity. Never before has the vulnerability of our port cities been exposed so blatantly and brutally. Our enemies know now just how ill-guarded or unguarded our shores are, what sitting strategic targets they provide. Another cause for alarm is the symbolic significance of the targeted spots. The Taj and Oberoi are bastions of international presence and India’s face of globalisation. The message from the terrorists is loud and clear — they intend to not only instil fear but also jeopardise India’s economic interests.

—Sarthak Gupta, New Delhi