Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

White Paper, Red China

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Even as the world was riveted by Barack Obama’s coronation and first days in office, the Chinese government released its defence white paper for 2008. This is the sixth such policy document from Beijing, the last one having come out in 2006, and an attempt by the Chinese government to assuage the concerns around the world about its rapidly growing military capabilities. And this time the Chinese Ministry of National Defence held a press conference about it. 

    That’s because China’s rapid arms buildup has generated apprehension worldwide. Defence spending in 2008 rose by nearly 18 per cent to almost $45 billion, the biggest increase since 2002. China has announced double digit military spending increases nearly every year since the early ’90s and its defence expenditure has increased by an average of about 15 per cent a year from 1990 to 2005. Yet the declared military spending by China only represents about a third of its actual military spending, if equipment purchases are taken into account. The rest of the world is making a concerted bid to engage China on military issues so as to remove the veil of secrecy that surrounds China’s military plans and spending.  

    Ads by Google

    But while China’s white paper makes it clear that moving from infantry to high-tech naval and aerial warfare is a major goal, and it does talk about China’s plans to build new types of submarines, destroyers, frigates and aircrafts, no mention is made of aircraft carriers or of nuclear-powered submarines equipped with ballistic missiles, both expected to be added in the next couple of years. The white paper offers no budgetary specifics, thereby not improving the transparency about Chinese defence spending — the ostensible reason for the papers. This year China will begin construction of two medium-sized aircraft carriers, and with a refurbished 55,000-tonne Soviet built Kuznetsov-class carrier, the Varyag, China will have three operational aircraft carriers in the next 5-6 years. This will have a profound impact on Beijing’s regional power projection. In the first-ever deployment of Chinese warships in distant waters, its navy is working to combat Somalian piracy. China intends to further develop its capabilities to operate effectively in distant waters. 

    ... contd.

    Next123
    Indians should relaxBy: Frank of Seattle | 08-Feb-2009 Reply | Forward Indians should relax a little. China has enough people. They do not want to control another billion.
    Only Israel and Japan can help IndiaBy: Raman | 04-Feb-2009 Reply | Forward Biggest weapon China is having is Pakistan (indirect-muslim population) outside India and Communist traitors within India. As people are voting for coalitions which need pro-muslim and communist supports to sustain Govts., India can never answer international challenges to its full inherent capacity. Pseudo-secularism and Indian communism never allow India to challenge Islamic terrorism or Chinese hegemony. And nationalist population of India just watch helplessly the decay of all promises India holds. West is not a friend of India either, as it views India as Hindu-India, and not one of them! It is clear from the stuff western funded Indian media churns out every day to show India/Hindus in bad light with lamest excuses. Only true friends could be Japan and Israel. But until India accepts real problems, they can't help it fighting Islamic terrorism or China hegemony.
    China's White PaperBy: Vijay Vikram | 02-Feb-2009 Reply | Forward Timely intervention by Harsh Pant. I was afraid that Indian strategic discourse had slunck back to its Subcontinental comfort zone. China presents India with a comprehensive strategic challenge. The strategic threats emenating from Pakistan are short-term and obvious but are essentially secondary to those presented by China.Thanks to our inferior economic resources it's unlikely that we'll be able to outspend the Chinese, but it would help if we start evolving an actual security strategy. I suppose this is the price we pay for our messy democracy.
    STRATEGIC PACT WITH USBy: Guru | 02-Feb-2009 Reply | Forward Time has come for India to sign a strategic pact with the US for countering the Chinese threat. This should include extension of the US missile shield over India, hosting US nuclear missiles in India and frequesnt joint military exercise alond the Chinese border. India should form a military alliance with countries such as Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Vietnam including the US to counter long term threat from China in this region. INDIA AND THE US HAS TO CONTAIN THE EXPANSIONIST CHINA TOGETHER TO MAKE THE WORLD A SAFER PLACE IN THE FUTURE.
    Indian responseBy: oldindian | 02-Feb-2009 Reply | Forward Before addressing the issue of india's defence preparedness, questions need to be asked regarding india's awareness, forget assessment, of threats and challenges around it. And wheter its response is an extension of its muddied definition of secularism - panch sheel, non alignment and all the crap of 60's - that is used as reference point by the thinking bureaucrats and politicians to define, assess threats, imbalances, challenges, opportunity facing the country. Its inability to establish a footprint in afghanistan 8 years after fall of taliban and failure to leverage that against pakistan is mere indication of it. And the way india fails to respond to undermining of its positiion by small time neighbor nepal just strengthen the notion that india has wrapped itself in puzzles and knots when addressing foreign policy. In the abscence of that, shaking hands with U S president is not going to help us much.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.