Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

White Paper, Red China

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • One of the lessons China’s military has seemingly learnt from recent wars is that technological sophistication is the sine qua non for effective military operations in the contemporary strategic environment. Since 2003, the world’s biggest standing army has been gradually shrinking and has been reduced to 2.3 million soldiers, with spending now focused on better training and advanced state-of-the-art weaponry. China intends to reach the strategic goal of building informationised armed forces and being capable of winning informationised wars by the mid-21st century.

    While not mentioning the US by name, the paper makes a comparison between the present superpower and the emerging one. In contrast to a unilateralist America that apparently seeks to enfeeble China “by supporting diplomatic struggles with military means,” China itself, according to the latest document, “will never seek hegemony or engage in military expansion now or in the future, no matter how developed it becomes.” Interestingly, the paper underlines growing Chinese unease about changing policies of the US in Asia suggesting that “the US has increased its strategic attention to and input in the Asia-Pacific region, further consolidating its military alliances, adjusting its military deployment and enhancing its military capabilities.” 

    Ads by Google

    India needs to urgently review its defence preparedness vis-à-vis China. As the policy paralysis post- Mumbai has revealed, we seem to have lost our conventional superiority vis-à-vis Pakistan. The real challenge for India, however, lies in China’s rise as military power. If the latest white paper is any indication, China already views itself as a superpower-in-waiting and despite all the lofty pronouncements, a Chinese hegemony in the region will adversely impact upon Indian interests. The Indian government owes it to the nation to set this imbalance right.  

    ... contd.

    PreviousNext123
    Indians should relaxBy: Frank of Seattle | 08-Feb-2009 Reply | Forward Indians should relax a little. China has enough people. They do not want to control another billion.
    Only Israel and Japan can help IndiaBy: Raman | 04-Feb-2009 Reply | Forward Biggest weapon China is having is Pakistan (indirect-muslim population) outside India and Communist traitors within India. As people are voting for coalitions which need pro-muslim and communist supports to sustain Govts., India can never answer international challenges to its full inherent capacity. Pseudo-secularism and Indian communism never allow India to challenge Islamic terrorism or Chinese hegemony. And nationalist population of India just watch helplessly the decay of all promises India holds. West is not a friend of India either, as it views India as Hindu-India, and not one of them! It is clear from the stuff western funded Indian media churns out every day to show India/Hindus in bad light with lamest excuses. Only true friends could be Japan and Israel. But until India accepts real problems, they can't help it fighting Islamic terrorism or China hegemony.
    China's White PaperBy: Vijay Vikram | 02-Feb-2009 Reply | Forward Timely intervention by Harsh Pant. I was afraid that Indian strategic discourse had slunck back to its Subcontinental comfort zone. China presents India with a comprehensive strategic challenge. The strategic threats emenating from Pakistan are short-term and obvious but are essentially secondary to those presented by China.Thanks to our inferior economic resources it's unlikely that we'll be able to outspend the Chinese, but it would help if we start evolving an actual security strategy. I suppose this is the price we pay for our messy democracy.
    STRATEGIC PACT WITH USBy: Guru | 02-Feb-2009 Reply | Forward Time has come for India to sign a strategic pact with the US for countering the Chinese threat. This should include extension of the US missile shield over India, hosting US nuclear missiles in India and frequesnt joint military exercise alond the Chinese border. India should form a military alliance with countries such as Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Vietnam including the US to counter long term threat from China in this region. INDIA AND THE US HAS TO CONTAIN THE EXPANSIONIST CHINA TOGETHER TO MAKE THE WORLD A SAFER PLACE IN THE FUTURE.
    Indian responseBy: oldindian | 02-Feb-2009 Reply | Forward Before addressing the issue of india's defence preparedness, questions need to be asked regarding india's awareness, forget assessment, of threats and challenges around it. And wheter its response is an extension of its muddied definition of secularism - panch sheel, non alignment and all the crap of 60's - that is used as reference point by the thinking bureaucrats and politicians to define, assess threats, imbalances, challenges, opportunity facing the country. Its inability to establish a footprint in afghanistan 8 years after fall of taliban and failure to leverage that against pakistan is mere indication of it. And the way india fails to respond to undermining of its positiion by small time neighbor nepal just strengthen the notion that india has wrapped itself in puzzles and knots when addressing foreign policy. In the abscence of that, shaking hands with U S president is not going to help us much.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.