Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Whither 377?

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • The Delhi high court judgment on Section 377 is not only constitutionally correct but also necessary to annul anomalies of personal laws in India. The judgment is based on the premise that all laws which discriminate against individuals on grounds of sex and sexuality would violate constitutionally-granted fundamental rights. The judgment doesn’t say anything about the ethical or social values of homosexuality. I, therefore, wish that this case is carried to the Supreme Court where, in my opinion, the view of the Delhi high court is likely to be upheld. If this happens, not only homosexuals but also women of all communities will be protected from alleged discriminatory provisions of their personal laws. Also, those who apprehend that this judgment would trivialise the institution of marriage are misinformed.

    — T.U. Mehta

    Former Chief Justice (Retd) High Court of Himachal Pardesh

    Ads by Google

    Faith renewed

    Gautam Bhan’s ‘On freedom’s avenue’ made one realise that the high court ruling is indeed a step towards a more liberal India. However, it’s not just that. The judgment is a reaffirmation of the sanctity and power of the Constitution. Equality before law for LGBTs and ceasing to treat them as criminals should tell us that India can find inspiration within, instead of turning to the West.

    — Rashmi Partoti

    Pune

    Social sentiments

    There’s no doubt Mamata Banerjee’s “populist” railway budget has a lot of innovations. When it comes to the “worrying sentiments”, I believe these sentiments should be considered socially worthwhile. As the biggest public employer in the world, the Indian Railways can’t ignore welfare of the aam janata. Some of Banerjee’s innovations will generate indirect employment, while the budget is kind to the passenger. Since we talk of corporate social responsibility, the Railways could lead the way.

    — Saumya Brata Panda

    Noida

    Derailed?

    It’s always good to hear a minister championing social viability over economic viability. But shouldn’t there be limits to populism? Mamata Banerjee should know that while we can assess economic viability, there’s no way to measure “social viability”. The Union rail budget makes one apprehensive because of the spectres of a larger state role that it seems to let loose. Such notions of state power are indeed exaggerated.

    — Bellur S. Dattatri

    Pune

    Still insecure

    P. Chidambaram must realise that setting up NSG hubs is not a guarantee of security. NSG commandos will act only after an attack. So the police and intelligence agencies will still be responsible for averting terror strikes. Security can’t be guaranteed without greater Union control over policing. Perhaps law and order should be made a Union subject to begin with.

    — N.V.S.N. Murthy

    Gandhinagar

    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.