Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Who’s the aam aadmi?

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • But for this to work, the common man (read the poor) has to be defined and one can’t resort to R.K. Laxman. Several (around 15, not only Brazil, Mexico and Indonesia) developing countries have experimented with cash transfers, both conditional and unconditional. Conditional transfers are contingent on BPL households attaining some developmental outcomes — sending children to school, immunising children, obtaining skills training. Often, there are paternalistic responses in opposition to unconditional cash transfers. The poor are irresponsible — they will spend money on cola, cell phones, liquor. They shouldn’t have unrestricted right to choose. Accordingly, conditional transfers also have this paternalistic element, usually linking subsidies to human capital investment. Interpreted thus, coupons or vouchers (food, education, health, fertiliser, kerosene) are also conditional transfers, since they can only be used for specific

    Ads by Google

    purposes. But they do introduce elements of choice, competition and efficiency. Whenever cash transfers (conditional or unconditional) are mentioned, three counter-responses are encountered. First, giving money is demeaning. It’s like doles and charity. It’s far better to give jobs instead. That’s a strange argument. As with NREGA, no one is forcing beneficiaries to receive subsidies. It’s a voluntary system.

    Second, we don’t have resources. That’s a strange argument too. Cash transfers are revenue neutral. No one has suggested there should be cash transfers while retaining present subsidies. Third, we don’t have administrative delivery mechanisms. That’s a stranger argument. In any targeting, there are problems of exclusion (not including deserving poor) and inclusion (including non-deserving non-poor), especially if proxy and collective (community, geographical location, religious or caste background) indicators are used instead of individual means-testing. But is it the case that present subsidies don’t have these problems? On the contrary, there is enough evidence to show the present mechanisms are riddled with these problems. If anything, cash transfers should reduce these problems.

    ... contd.

    PreviousNext1234
    undesirous zealBy: MOHD NOORUDDIN | 30-May-2009 Reply | Forward i am not satisfied with that undesirous article, not consisting the problem of aam admi.the article must be factual and interesting for all sections of modern society.jai hind.
    undesirous zealBy: MOHD NOORUDDIN | 30-May-2009 Reply | Forward i am not satisfied with that undesirous article, not consisting the problem of aam admi.the article must be factual and interesting for all sections of modern society.jai hind.
    excellent articleBy: vinit | 29-May-2009 Reply | Forward Excellent article.THoughts of common people are same. I also personally checked MNIC website, but nothing is happening still shows "under construction", I thought nobody cares about the e-governance projects.Keep up with the good work about informing the readers about governance.
    well researched articleBy: harpreet dusanjh | 29-May-2009 Reply | Forward i gone thru this article today in my library, and i am pleased to comment that it is a well written article, i have noted its facts and detaisl in my diary kept by me for making notes on IAS prepartion. please keep publishing these sort of articles. nothing is impossible, the only thing is political willpower for upliftment of common man of india and yes, we need to give a start to it right now.
    Waste of timeBy: rohit | 29-May-2009 Reply | Forward What a waste of time it was to read first few lines of the article. Article is thoroughly boring, out of place and time
    uselessBy: suvrat | 12-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward go and read latest gossip abt Shahrukh Khan isntead, you are fit for that only
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.