Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Whose Railways? LS debate picks up steam

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • The discussion on the Railway Budget in Lok Sabha on Tuesday had MPs taking swipes at each other, forcing railway minister Mamata Banerjee to join issue, at times snapping in anger, at times in bemusement, with Opposition MPs.

    Ananth Kumar, BJP leader and MP from Bangalore (South) who initiated the debate, accused Banerjee of reducing the Railways to a modern-day variant of the East India Company, implying that most developmental measures finding mention in the minister’s Budget,”were meant for West Bengal and east Indian states".

    “You should have a pan-Indian outlook, but your Budget reads like an election manifesto... Of the 309 model stations proposed in your Budget, 40 are in and around Kolkata, and 109 in West Bengal," Kumar said.

    When Banerjee replied”it was for MPs to suggest names of more stations which will be duly incorporated in the proposed scheme", Kumar said the Railways should be conducting this exercise. He accused her of”having a West Bengal bias".

    Ads by Google

    Visibly upset, Banerjee told him:”Don’t insult Bengal." He retorted:”Don’t insult Bangalore," suggesting that the Karnataka capital had not been accorded its due place in the Railway Budget.

    Ananth Kumar then said he”loved Rabindranath Tagore and Vande Mataram more than Mamata." To this, Banerjee said:”I love Bengal, I love Bangalore, and this entire exercise is for a larger entity called India".

    Continuing with the discussion, Congress MP from Nagpur, Vilas Muttemwar, while praising the Budget, inadvertently referred to Mumbai as “Bombay", prompting BJP MP Gopinath Munde to demand an immediate correction.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    Mamata Banerjee's Railway MinistryBy: Suresh Panje | 08-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Mysore state (now Karnataka) had three Railway Ministers - C M Poonacha, Kengal Hanumantiah, T A Pai and C K Jaffer Sherif. None of them undertook any gigantic railway related projects but for the Bangalore-Salem and Hasan-Mangalore rail links. Of course, there was the Wheel Axle plant at Yelhanka. Other than these, these ministers did not behave a-la Mamata Banerjee and Ghani Khan Chowdhury or Jagjivan Ram, L N Mishra, Kedar Pandey, Ramvilas Paswan and Nitish Kumar, rendering step motherly treatment for states other than their own. George Fernandes, a Mangalorean, was also a Railway Minister but he represented Bihar. Well, we need ministers with a national outlook and not blinkered views, confined to their own state or region.
    RAILWAYBy: Neduncheziyan | 08-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward not only mamatha but also lalu any one else, from the begining of our indipendence, all northern leaders heading central governemnt did their counter part to benifit north india only. all indistrial
    DiscriminationBy: Rahul Vats | 08-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Mamta Has not done good as she only thought of her state of higher priority.The priority should be given to all Indian states without no discrimination.What does she mean by saying "I love Bengal, I love Bangalore". Strict measures are to taken before opening your mouth Mamta Ji as what ever you say can be used against you to prove someting that you dont want.
    Discrimination has been made since 1951: Nothing NewBy: G J Shankar Nath | 08-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Indian Politicians are making discrimination since 1951 and will continue to make. The best idea is to create a capable minister from your region and then discriminate. As for example the NE region, I belong to and there is not enough progress as we have not been able to send capable minister in the cabinet.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.