Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Why doesn’t the US hold a dialogue with Osama?

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • As someone who thought Barack Obama really was ‘the one’, I find myself increasingly disillusioned by his South Asia policy. Is he so naïve that he believes Islamist terrorism can be fought selectively? How is it possible to fight the Taliban in Swat and Waziristan while continuing to support the Lashkar brand of jihad in Lahore and Karachi?

    How can anyone believe that the Pakistan government is sincere in its fight against jihadi terrorism when it releases the man who started the Lashkar-e-Tayyaba? If you want to hear Hafiz Mohammed Saeed’s thoughts and feelings about India, go to You Tube and listen to the interview he gave last week. He accuses India of being responsible for every act of terrorism on Pakistani soil and of being behind the violence in Baluchistan. The suggestion that India is responsible for sponsoring Islamist violence is beyond bizarre. If our covert agencies were that good, we would have taken the Taliban, the Lashkar and the evil Maulana Azhar Masood out long ago. Where is Azhar Masood, by the way? Does the Pakistani government expect us to seriously believe that he has vanished into thin air?

    Ads by Google

    While I was writing this piece, bombs went off in Lahore and Naushera. It is true that the jihadis have started to bite the hand that nurtured them, but is this not the inevitable consequence of two decades of breeding violent religious fanatics with the idea of making them the sword arm of Pakistani foreign policy? And, now that Pakistan appears to be coming apart at the seams, all that the new American President has come up with by way of policy is to give Pakistan more aid. If financial aid was the solution to Pakistan’s problems then it should have been saved long ago by the more than $11 billion that George W. Bush gave Musharraf to fight terrorism.

    ... contd.

    PreviousNext123
    India's attitudeBy: suryaprakash | 22-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward Our weak foreign policy making a big price, recent bombay episode,product of it, still we havn'tn realised.we have not hanged objal guru who attacked the parlament,due,to vote bank politics.If our foreign policy continues like this we have to prepared for more attacks,problem is, our inefficient governament. why should?our primeminister talk with pakis,azharmasood is most notorious terrorist, pakistan released him it shows thier concern towards india. americ better understands the pakistan,showing stepmotherly treatment situations prevailing in pakistan.India requires a strong, uncompromisesd attitude,to deal with pakistan. our prime minister must act indipendently
    World fantasy-part 2By: Raj | 18-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward What you sow, what you reap. Even though Pakistan is reaping the bitter harvest, it still hasn’t abandoned the desire to use terrorism as an instrument of state policy.Only naive people will buy Pak line on due process of law on the release of Lashkar terrorist Sayeed. Pakis talking about independent judiciary, due process of law, etc is like Osama Bin Laden hitting the lecture circuit to give talks on World Peace and Meditation.Lashkar-e-taiba is the jihadi terrorist wing of Pakistan army, 100% under the control of Pak army. To the extent, Pak army sought the help of LeT to defend positions in the Kargil war.India should focus on economic development as it is doing. “Dialogue” with Pakistan is for international consumption. India should dramatically escalate the cost Pakistan pays for terrorism in India (tip- more consulates i Afghanistan). Keep the powder dry, increase and improve surveillance.Don’t EVER assume paki brain can abandon terrorism as a state policy!
    World fantasy-part 1By: RAJ | 18-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward The general tone of western media reporting is such that there is a tiny group of extremists in Pakistan, and the Pakistan state and its people are with the rest of the civilized world in fighting religious terrorism. This is sheer fallacy of gargantuan proportion.Pakistan merely considers “war on terror” as a money making tool, to milk the US/west and the rest of the world. There is no future prospects for any other industrial development in Pakistan, but the “terrorism industry” is very rewarding for Pakistan and it is reaping a windfall of billions of US tax dollars. It is a huge lie to claim ordinary people in Pakistan are against terrorism, etc. Specifically, they are against terrorism in Lahore, Islamabad and Karachi. Not in Mumbai,Delhi, Kabul, New York or London!For decades, the so called “moderate” “ordinary” PakIs egged on, cheered on Pak terrorism in India and elsewhere and vigorously claimed they had nothing to do with it.
    OSAMABy: faiz ahmad | 18-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward you fools, there is no osama, there is no al-qaida....It was all created by US to fool, fools like you....
    what else did u expect?By: shiney | 17-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward Around 23% of the nuts in this country voted to bring this government to power and all of us will suffer for it.Wasnt this obvious all the time that post election we will start talking to Pakistan? When have we behaved like a strong country in the last 50 yrs? Our intention to be fair is always mistaken and taken advantage of. Wasnt this predictable all the time? We will start talking and then there will be another attack, another shoddy response, another break in talks, again resumption because america tells us to do so. This is xtremely sad but indian foreign policy has become xtremely predictable. Where is Mr. Rahul Gandhi who said terrorists will be taught a lesson on the worth of every indian life after 26/11? How many more lives does he want to give up? Saddest part is the terrorists dont touch these politicians, its always the common people who get impacted. Thats the tragedy.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.