Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Why fore-cast was not fore-warned

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Yogendra Yadav

    Instead of mounting her now-famous verbal assault on the ‘Manuwadi’ media, Mayawati preferred sarcasm in her opening statement in the first press conference after the election. Feigning to apologise for being inaccessible during the campaign, she said she did not wish to “disturb” the media while it was busy making all kinds of projections. Mayawati did not mention opinion and exit polls separately, but there is little doubt that these were her principal targets.

    After the Lok Sabha poll of 2004, the assembly election of Uttar Pradesh is clearly an instance of collective failure of opinion and exit polls. In relative terms, the Indian Express-CNN-IBN-CSDS post poll can definitely claim to have been the best of the lot. Our forecast captured the trend accurately, projected the BSP way ahead of its rivals (we projected 152-168 seats for it), forewarned that the BSP could “do better than projected here” and said that the BJP will finish a poor third. Yet, as my colleague Rajeeva Karandikar put it, this was the case of the best not being good enough. The fact is that none of the polls, including ours, came close to suggesting a clear majority for the BSP.

    Ads by Google

    This was a clear instance of the triumph of old-style political journalism over the new fangled number crunching. Political reporters may not have talked about a clear majority for the BSP, but they did capture the hawa. If you read the despatches by Manini Chatterjee, reportage by Vidya Subrahmaniam, articles by Mahesh Rangarajan or the field stories in papers like Jansatta and Amar Ujala — you got a clear sense of a decisive victory for the BSP.

    ... contd.

    Next123
    forecastBy: Janardan | 16-May-2007 Reply | Forward What about you going wrong in Panjab and Uttrakhand polls? None of your presnt arguments will hold in those cases and you will invent new causes in these cases. The fact of the matter is that opinion and exit polls are advertisements paid for by interested groups/parties. They are not honest reporting at all!
    Courageous EnoughBy: Sunil Kumar | 16-May-2007 Reply | Forward One should accpet that Yogendra Yadav' article is quite courageous and introsdpective. One would like to see the impact of low voting and repurcation of the same on estimates of pollsters.
    Why fore-cast was not fore-warned By: K.Suresh | 16-May-2007 Reply | Forward A good psephologist is not one who forecasts more accurately but one who can justify wrong predictions. It is not easy to come up with plausible excuses for wrong forecast election after election. And Mr Yadav has done admirably.
    exit pollBy: sourav | 16-May-2007 Reply | Forward It is to justify that we are best among the worst. It is the fact that none of these forecast are matches or very close from the actual result. Mr Rajdeep Sardesai editor in chief of cnn-ibn try to prove on a program on 13-05 night that we are the best . but best for what, it is always better to accept the mistake and try to rectify in next election.Mr Rajdeep Sardesai editor in chief of cnn-ibn should learn this as quickly as possible to avoid any such error in next election.
    fore-castBy: satya | 16-May-2007 Reply | Forward It is not an easy job and you did failry well. You rightly acknowledge there is still a lot of gap but you can minimise it in the future. cheers satya
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.