Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Why India should not be like this only

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Sudheendra Kulkarni
    Personal Loan

    What will it take for India to go the Bangladesh way or the way of Pakistan? Look at what is happening in our neighbourhood. In Bangla-desh, parliamentary elections have been indefinitely postponed. A quasi-military authority has taken over. It wanted to send the two sparring former prime ministers — Sheikh Hasina and Khaleda Zia — into exile. The plan didn’t succeed only due to intense domestic and international outcry. Nevertheless, Sheikh Hasina has been arrested recently on flimsy charges. In Pakistan, two former prime ministers — Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif — have been in forced exile for nearly ten years now. General Musharraf has ensured they don’t return to Pakistan, except on his terms, and is now planning to get himself re-elected as president-in-uniform for another five-year term.

    “But such things will never happen in India,” you will say. Our democratic system is too robust and deep-rooted to be so brazenly subverted, you will add. I share your faith in Indian democracy. Nevertheless, I cannot help draw your attention to some dark clouds gathering in the distant horizon. By the time this column appears, Pratibha Patil will have won the presidential election, thanks to the UPA’s numerical superiority and questionable abstentions by many political parties. And in democracy, the verdict of the majority must ultimately be respected.

    Ads by Google

    However, democracy is much more than an unnees-bees ka khel. When the election was for the country’s highest constitutional office, the criteria for selecting the candidate ought to have conformed to the highest ideals of our Constitution and the stiffest ethical standards of democracy. Instead, as proved by the subsequent murky disclosures about Pratibha Patil, the UPA selected her on the basis of the “least common moral denominator”. (I have borrowed the term from an excellent blog — www.offstumped.nationalinterest.in — that states: “When public conscience is reduced to a moral vacuum, politics becomes a bottomless pit inhabited by politicians aspiring for the least common moral denominator.”) In other words, the criterion applied by the UPA chairperson for the candidate’s selection was: “Am I not entitled to having my loyal person in Rashtrapati Bhawan?”

    ... contd.

    Next123
    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.