You are here: IE »   Story

Why is India’s ‘Regent’ PM angry?

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Discount UK Shopping

    Of late, our soft-spoken Prime Minister has begun using harsh language—not about the enemies of the nation but about the leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha. And it’s not just him, his leader too is doing that.

    Sonia Gandhi does not like Dr Manmohan Singh being called a “weak” Prime Minister. At an election rally last week, she angrily declared that BJP leader L.K. Advani’s description of Dr Singh as a “weak” PM amounts to showing disrespect to the nation. It is baffling how a critical assessment of Dr Singh’s performance as PM can invite this grave charge. A few days later, Dr Singh himself termed Advani’s criticism as “abusive”. I wonder if Dr Singh really doesn’t know the difference between criticism and abuse. Either he thinks any criticism of him is necessarily an insult or he has deliberately used a harsher word in the hope of winning public sympathy.

    Ads by Google

    Both Advani’s criticism of the PM and the latter’s diatribe against Advani need to be dissected. Dr Singh’s partymen and supporters may think he is a strong PM. They are entitled to their judgement, just as his critics are entitled to theirs. The only way this can be debated meaningfully is by foregrounding the debate against the PM’s actual performance in the last five years. Take, for example, the most recent episode of the Congress Party having been shamed into withdrawing Jagdish Tytler and Sajjan Kumar as its candidates for the Lok Sabha polls in New Delhi. The PM says he was neither informed nor consulted in the matter of the CBI’s clean chit to Tytler for his alleged involvement in the carnage of Sikhs in 1984. Mr Prime Minister, the CBI functions directly under you. Were you similarly kept in the dark when the CBI allowed Ottavio Quattrocchi to go scot-free with the Bofors booty?

    ... contd.

    Next1234
    Did you get the answer ?By: Aditya Talwalkar | 19-May-2009 Reply | Forward Mr. Sudheendra Kulkarni,I guess you got the answer after the election results. Being Strong or Weak also depends on who supports the leaders. I think Advani was weaker than Dr. Singh because when he made the statement on Jinnah his entire party dumped him but the entire UPA stood behind Dr. Singh during the nuclear deal even at the risk of sacrificing the government. How can a leader be called strong if his own party dumps him and then brings him back because there was noone to replace him. What is the guarantee that his party would have listened to him after the elections?
    dr.Manmohan singh and sonia have insulted the PMship and the nationBy: Dr.G.Srinivasan | 26-Apr-2009 Reply | Forward IT is Sonia Gandhi who had insulted the chair of PM by putting an unelected person at the helm of affairs. By his she had insulted the citizens of this nation , the chair of the PM and the constitution.The constitution first drawn in 1949 and approved by the "FEW for the few and of the few" does not state that you hold an election to Appoint a PM" the elections today are held at a cost of 2 billion dollars "not to elect a PM but to appoint a PM"In sixty years congress has changed what started as a democracy into a dictatorship!!!!!
    Very good article indeedBy: Himanshu Sharma | 23-Apr-2009 Reply | Forward Very good article indeed. PM of India is a real week person and everyone knows that. He is just keeping the chair warm and as soon as the next member of Gandhi dynasty gets it, he will be shown the door.
    Kidding Indians ?By: Shivakumar | 22-Apr-2009 Reply | Forward By saying that speaking about the PM in a critical manner is an insult to the nation, Madam Sonia Gandhi's respect for freedom of expression becomes suspect. It is true that we must respect our leaders but this does not mean that we cannot criticize them. Unfortunately for the congress Mr. Advani has hit the nail right on its head, when he spoke about MMS being a weak PM. Mr. Advani has not questioned the wisdom of the PMs decisions, he has only said that the PM has to look elsewhere for approval of his decisions, which is a weakening of the PMs position. By replying that LKA seeks approval from RSS, Madam Soniaji is only diverting attention and not answering the criticism squarely.
    strong P.M.By: chiranjib | 19-Apr-2009 Reply | Forward P.M.IS IF STRONG THEN WHY HE IS NOT DOING ANYTHING FOR POOR SIKH MINORITY LIVING IN PAKISTAN, THESE PEOPLE ARE BEING TOURTURED BY TALIBANS AS REPORTED IN MEDIA.IF HE IS STRONG THEN WHY HE IS HESITATING TO SACK LALOO PRASAD FROM HIS MINISTRY WHEN HE IS OPENY ACCUSING CONG PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR MASJID DEMOLISION
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.