Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Why Pakistan won’t give up lashkar

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Lashkar
    Students at a school run by the Jamat-ud-Dawa in Muridke near Lahore. AP

    So why is it impossible for Pakistan’s government to hand over Lashkar ideologue Hafiz Mohammad Sayeed to New Delhi when it did not hesitate to arrest Khalid Sheikh Mohammad and other al-Qaeda men for the Americans?

    This difference in intensity and focus while confronting jihadi groups active against the United States in Afghanistan and India are seen as a dichotomy in Pakistan’s policy. It’s this contradiction that provides Pakistan with a strategic edge. A military escalation with India threatens to shift Pakistan’s focus from the war against Taliban, jeopardising US interests in the region. This makes a US intervention to prevent a military confrontation between India and Pakistan a guaranteed fact. But it is impossible for Pakistan’s government to go against militant groups on New Delhi’s behest. Since its creation, the Kashmir dispute has been at the core of Pakistan’s very existence. Unlike Afghanistan, Kashmir has traditionally been a major influence on Pakistan’s domestic as well as foreign policy. Though the Pakistani government launched a crackdown after the Parliament attack, it insisted that this shift did not mean it was abandoning its support to separatists in Kashmir.

    Ads by Google

    Deobandi Taliban vs Salafi Lashkar

    The other aspect that influences Pakistan’s policy is to do with ideological and demographic differences between the Taliban and the Lashkar. The Taliban movement in Afghanistan and Pakistan is primarily based on the Deobandi school of thought while the Lashkar is Salafi. Deobandis belong to the Hanafi school of Islamic jurisprudence and follow Imam Abu Hanifa while the Salafis do not follow any particular Imam and consider the Quran and Hadith as their only guide. Apart from the differences in the practice of religion, while Deobandis in Pakistan seek the establishment of an Islamic State in its letter and spirit and even favour a jihad against the establishment, the Salafis do not support rebellion against the government in a Muslim country and rather advocate reform to turn the ruling elite into “Muslims at heart”. This Salafi non-confrontationist approach towards Pakistan’s ruling elite is shaped by the teachings of Imam Ibn-e-Taymiyah—a major influence in the Salafi movement worldwide. This means that Lashkar or its parent organisation, the Markaz-e-Dawa-wal-Irshad, was never a security risk for the Pakistani state.

    ... contd.

    PreviousNext1234
    Why?By: skpandita | 09-Dec-2008 Reply | Forward sir Does any one abondon children obviously no that is the reason why it wont and besides the ideology pakis tan has is to bleed india and lashkar does that.and let me answer to the gentlemen below we know it is about water so what... and what about the other areas my friend vaccate them first ok then talk we shall talk ok .
    Pak dbl stdsBy: Ramesh Ahuja | 08-Dec-2008 Reply | Forward It is impossible to have dialogues with the Pakistanis.So India should not waste anymore time trying to convince /negotiate with them. Its like talking to a donkey who has never heard the word PEACE.The only language they understand is what the Iraq and Afghan govts understand. We in India used to think that the govt. and military in Pak was crazy but the common man was sensible. But I was shocked to see that most bloggers and the Pak media sing the same tune as that of the Govt./ISI. They keep saying that Pakistan also is the victim of terror. Please do not compare India with Pak.Pak is not a victim,but has provided(still providing) all the support so far and now you crying about it. Your love for terrorists is causing a lot of trouble for us. If the Pakis deny that they dont love their terrorists, why havent they still wiped them out. And if they are incapable, why do they become so hostile when India or US wants to bomb the terror camps?
    terroist campsBy: prema | 10-Dec-2008 Reply | Forward I think it's time India thought about the LTTE camps too
    Why Pakistan won’t give up lashkarBy: Tariq Qureshi | 08-Dec-2008 Reply | Forward No matter how you view Mumbai, the real reason is Kashmir?Unless Kashmir issue is resolved there can never be peace, no matter how many 'externally' supported presidents and PM's are proped in Pakistan. You cannot go against people wishes. Let there be UN chartered pabelicite in Kashmir, and the truth will be acceptable to both India and Pakistan. Let us not keep brushing the problem under the carpet. Remember Kashmir is not about land, its also about Water that Pakistan needs for its rivers. We are all discussing what happans today, the answer is in solving 60 years old Kashmir problem.
    Why Pakistan won't give up...By: Dr.Ajay Kumar | 07-Dec-2008 Reply | Forward Situaton in Pakistan is different. There is a democratically elected civilian government in office, but not in power. It has no authority. True authority lies with the Army Chief but he lacks legitimacy. Renegade elements in ISI take no order from anyone and act on their own in compicity with terrorist organisations. Then there are retired army and ISI chiefs who run ther own fiefdoms. No one will be handed over to India because if it is done so, they will sing and spill thebeans. The names they will spill will implicate people at the top. Who in the right frame of mind in Pakistan would want to do that ? Today Zardari , the same Mr 10 percent, wants proof that the terrorists are really Pakistani. Tomorrow he might want proof that Bombay massacre really happened, and not imagined to defame Pakistan. So stop demanding something that Pakistanis would not fulfill. India should take a leaf from Israel's Mossad. Send assissination squads to take out these vermins we want extradited.
    war on pakistanBy: Gauri Ghatnekar | 07-Dec-2008 Reply | Forward dear editor how is it permissible internationally that pakistan chooses not to give up lashkar? how can a mighty superpower like the us standby and decide that pakistan can choose its attachments of terror? and decide not to leave them free even for an instant? i fully support john mc cain when he sez that india should launch air strikes deep into pakistan. and rid the world of a neighbour that is so aggressive and so terror supporting. pakistan has not only frightened us but has also denied us international space, and a clout with our own people in our own state. it should resign its image as an entity and be branded a terrorist state. fear is not an association we make with pakistan rather it is so with india. why is this so? the first time one commits a mistake it can be forgiven. the second time it looks like it is deliberate. i have read that terrorist training camps supply tablets of cyanide to its jehadis. we are absolute guinea pigs for their constipated plans.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.