Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Widen the base

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • As China and India struggle to stabilise their wobbly relationship — the latest bump comes from Beijing’s protest against Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s visit to Arunachal Pradesh — there is one big missing link. It is the absence of sustained engagement between their political classes.

    Bilateral trade may have risen more than fifty-fold over the last ten years, but there is little contact between the leading cadres of the Chinese Communist Party and the Indian political parties. It is in the interest of neither country to have its political class view the other through the distorting prism of media and internet chatter.

    The CCP has indeed reached out to both the Congress and the BJP by looking beyond its traditional ties to the CPI and CPM. There is also growing academic exchange between the Chinese think tanks and their Indian counterparts.

    Ads by Google

    Nevertheless, from the perspective of China’s expansive international interaction, Beijing’s outreach to Indian civil society is rather thin. And Delhi’s penetration of China’s political universe, in turn, is shockingly shallow.

    The Indian communists could have been a natural bridge between the two societies; but their ideological blinkers have prevented them from becoming the interpreters of either the complex Chinese realities to India or Delhi’s political sensitivities and domestic compulsions to Beijing.

    There is no substitute then for greater contact and communication between the CCP and India’s many political parties, especially its younger leaders who can relate to a globalising China far more easily than their elders.

    The transformation of India’s relationship with the United States began only when Delhi and the Indian American community reached out to the political establishment in the United States. India must do the same with China by breaking out of its current narrow interface with a small section of Chinese bureaucracy.

    ... contd.

    Next123
    Whose fault?By: Thalmann P. Pereira | 19-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward 1) Mr. C. Raja Mohan seems to conveniently forget that CPI(M) is an acronym for the Communist Party of India (Marxist) - NOT Communist Postman of India (Marxist) !2) Before terming the Indian communists as wearing Ideological blinkers (a value judgment, one may say) could Mr. C. Raja Mohan care to publish his bibliographical list of readings of the CPI(M)'s or the CPI's resolutions and write-ups on China and the CPC ?
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.